Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:38, 9 December 2009 editShock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk | contribs)15,524 edits →Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: confirm← Previous edit Revision as of 17:49, 9 December 2009 edit undoMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,094 edits →Conclusions: Marking as closed and archiving. Everyone tagged.Next edit →
Line 59: Line 59:


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>======
{{SPIclose|archive}}

---- ----

Revision as of 17:49, 9 December 2009

Scibaby

Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.

Report date December 8 2009, 08:40 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by ChrisO

The usual pattern of behaviour on Phil Jones (climatologist) and other climate-related articles; brand-new accounts, created within an hour of each other, evidently familiar with Misplaced Pages and making a series of dovetailing edits in a pattern very typical of Scibaby. -- ChrisO (talk) 08:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz

Added Price to Pay - see contributions. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 08:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Added Wejer - looks like a sleeper too me, a few bursts of activity, nearly all minor edits, and now on Medieval Warm Period with elaborate if unreliably sourced comments. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 11:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kim D. Petersen (talk)

Added Fern360, HanJShul and Riley Ralston, completely new accounts that jump right into the typical patterns. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 08:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by ChrisO (talk) 15:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It will shortly be archived automatically.

{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.

Categories: