| Revision as of 12:42, 29 December 2005 editCommander Keane (talk | contribs)Administrators29,068 editsm user box name change← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:42, 29 December 2005 edit undoCommander Keane bot (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,778 editsm Automated text replacement (browser userboxes) Misplaced Pages:WikiProject UserboxesNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| {{Babel-22|en|ang-2|ca-2|cs-2|cy-2|de-3|es-3|fr-4|ga-2|he-3|hr-2|it-3|la-2|nl-2|pt-3|ru-2|sr-2|tlh-3|ot|que-1}} | {{Babel-22|en|ang-2|ca-2|cs-2|cy-2|de-3|es-3|fr-4|ga-2|he-3|hr-2|it-3|la-2|nl-2|pt-3|ru-2|sr-2|tlh-3|ot|que-1}} | ||
| {{user wikipedia}} {{user wikipedia|rcp}} {{user wikipedia|npa}} {{user browser}} {{user browser |
{{user wikipedia}} {{user wikipedia|rcp}} {{user wikipedia|npa}} {{user browser}} {{user browser:Microsoft Internet Explorer}} {{User OS:Microsoft Windows XP}} {{user Google}} {{user programming|level=0}} {{user zodiac|taurus}} {{user religion}} {{user cvg-3}} {{user Simpsons}} {{user ubx-5}} | ||
Revision as of 15:42, 29 December 2005
CIRIII
Hi and welcome to my user page. i began using Wiki only in summer 2005, and really see the benefets of it...I am very much in favour of a free encyclopaedia within the public domain and one that can be accessed and added to by everyone with few limitations on freedom of speech. When i see someone in a discussion page getting angry over something as it disagrees with their point of view (POV) I am a little perturbed that they do not understand the point of wikipedia as a tool for learning, and therfore by necessity free speech; nothing more.
I have a degree in history, specialising in European political and Royal history c600-1500 ad; any intrigues at the royal court, i'm your man. I consider myself fairly qualified in linguistical areas too (see Wikepedia:babel) and am quite happy to help with anything if I feel i can. I am pretty much an all rounder with lots of stuff...and when i start editing and creating articles, I hope this comes through.
People are driving me mad!! I go to a very well written article and in the discussions page there are numerous complaints concerning the article, however the complainers have only complained; not made any effort to edit, hold a referendum on changes or are simply bemoaning nationalistic history! Most of all many people seem to forget that an an ecyclopaedia is a tool for learning and can hold articles as varied as "the amoeba" to "paedophilia", but there is a difference between learningabout something and being taught how something's done. People need to BE BOLD...make those edits, don't be destructive or thoughtless and ask...but use common sense and initiative! I loathe vandalism and also articles that, through lack of reading, or over editing, become a ramshackle of nothingness....instead of debating whether or not they should BE BOLD!!
 | This user is a Wikipedian. |
| This user is a Wikipedian. |
| This user is a Wikipedian. |
 | This user is using a web browser. |
 | This user contributes using Internet Explorer. |
Template:User OS:Microsoft Windows XP
 | This user uses  for Internet search. |
| prog | This user is a programmer. |
 | This user knows that no religion has a monopoly on truth. |
Template:User cvg-3 Template:User Simpsons Template:User ubx-5
My contributions:
]