Misplaced Pages

William Happer: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:59, 13 December 2009 editFlegelpuss (talk | contribs)207 edits Improve summary of testimony← Previous edit Revision as of 22:03, 13 December 2009 edit undoFlegelpuss (talk | contribs)207 edits redundant word, introduce U.S. CongressNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Notability|Biographies|date=September 2009}} {{Notability|Biographies|date=September 2009}}
'''William Happer''' is a professor of physics at ]. He was the director of energy research at the United States Department of Energy. He was fired from this position in 1993. According to ] he was fired for speaking out against the Clinton administration's views on how ] gases affect the ].<ref>{{ cite web | title=Political Science | url=http://www.sepp.org/Archive/controv/controversies/happer.html | publisher=Reason Magazine | author=Ronald Bailey | date=December 1993 | access-date=2009-12-13}}</ref> He also testified in Congress that the amount of UV-B light reaching the United States had declined. '''William Happer''' is a professor of physics at ]. He was the director of energy research at the United States Department of Energy. He was fired from this position in 1993. According to ] he was fired for speaking out against the Clinton administration's views on how ] gases affect the ].<ref>{{ cite web | title=Political Science | url=http://www.sepp.org/Archive/controv/controversies/happer.html | publisher=Reason Magazine | author=Ronald Bailey | date=December 1993 | access-date=2009-12-13}}</ref> He also testified in the United States Congress that the amount of UV-B light reaching the United States had declined.


In February 2009 Happer testified before the United States Congress, saying "I believe that the increase of ] is not a cause for alarm and will be good for mankind", for among other reasons because of its beneficial effects on plant growth.<ref>{{cite web | title=Climate change - statement of William Happer | url= http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=84462e2d-6bff-4983-a574-31f5ae8e8a42 | publisher=] | author=William Happer | date=February 25, 2009 | access-date=2009-09-25}}</ref> In February 2009 Happer testified before Congress, "I believe that the increase of ] is not a cause for alarm and will be good for mankind", for among other reasons because of its beneficial effects on plant growth.<ref>{{cite web | title=Climate change - statement of William Happer | url= http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=84462e2d-6bff-4983-a574-31f5ae8e8a42 | publisher=] | author=William Happer | date=February 25, 2009 | access-date=2009-09-25}}</ref>


== References == == References ==

Revision as of 22:03, 13 December 2009

The topic of this article may not meet Misplaced Pages's notability guideline for biographies. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted.
Find sources: "William Happer" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

William Happer is a professor of physics at Princeton University. He was the director of energy research at the United States Department of Energy. He was fired from this position in 1993. According to Ronald Bailey he was fired for speaking out against the Clinton administration's views on how CFC gases affect the ozone layer. He also testified in the United States Congress that the amount of UV-B light reaching the United States had declined.

In February 2009 Happer testified before Congress, "I believe that the increase of CO2 is not a cause for alarm and will be good for mankind", for among other reasons because of its beneficial effects on plant growth.

References

  1. Ronald Bailey (December 1993). "Political Science". Reason Magazine. Retrieved 2009-12-13.
  2. William Happer (February 25, 2009). "Climate change - statement of William Happer". U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. Retrieved 2009-09-25.

External links

Categories: