| Revision as of 11:21, 14 December 2009 editSemisharp (talk | contribs)1 editNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:27, 14 December 2009 edit undoZzuuzz (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators136,900 editsm Undid revision 331600547 by Semisharp (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''David Bukay''' is a Professor of Middle East Studies at the ]. He is the author of ''Islamic Fundamentalism and the Arab Political Culture''. He specializes in the ]; inter-Arab relations and the Palestinian question; international ] and fundamental ]; theoretical issues and political applications in the ]; ]'s foreign policy towards ] and ]; the culture approach to understanding the Middle-East. |
'''David Bukay''' is a Professor of Middle East Studies at the ]. He is the author of ''Islamic Fundamentalism and the Arab Political Culture''. He specializes in the ]; inter-Arab relations and the Palestinian question; international ] and fundamental ]; theoretical issues and political applications in the ]; ]'s foreign policy towards ] and ]; the culture approach to understanding the Middle-East. | ||
| ==Views== | ==Views== | ||
| Bukay is a supporter of the controversial ] thesis of the ]. He argues that there is a wide gap between what he categorises as "Western political culture" and "the Arab-Islamic political culture". Bukay also holds controversial opinions in his own right. In a speech to a conference in Jerusalem 1n 2003, he argued that "the aggressiveness and fanaticism of the Islamic fundamentalism is an existentially lethal phenomenon". He went on to claim that "Islam and democracy are totally incompatible, and are mutually inconclusive. The same applies to Modernity, which is perceived as a threat to Islamic civilization", and that "Leaders and policy-makers in the West refuse to grasp that the Islamic and Palestinian terrorism embodies the SARS decease: Suicide and Ruin Syndrome of democratic society. Until it is understood that this struggle is the war between the Son of Light against the Sons of Darkness, that they represent the invasion of the Huns, in order to destroy modern culture - the world will continue to face an existential more growing threat". <ref name=JerusalemSummit |
Bukay is a supporter of the controversial ] thesis of the ]. He argues that there is a wide gap between what he categorises as "Western political culture" and "the Arab-Islamic political culture". Bukay also holds controversial opinions in his own right. In a speech to a conference in Jerusalem 1n 2003, he argued that "the aggressiveness and fanaticism of the Islamic fundamentalism is an existentially lethal phenomenon". He went on to claim that "Islam and democracy are totally incompatible, and are mutually inconclusive. The same applies to Modernity, which is perceived as a threat to Islamic civilization", and that "Leaders and policy-makers in the West refuse to grasp that the Islamic and Palestinian terrorism embodies the SARS decease: Suicide and Ruin Syndrome of democratic society. Until it is understood that this struggle is the war between the Son of Light against the Sons of Darkness, that they represent the invasion of the Huns, in order to destroy modern culture - the world will continue to face an existential more growing threat". <ref name=JerusalemSummit>Bukay, David. , First Jerusalem Summit, October 12-14, 2003.</ref> | ||
| In his book ''Arab-Islamic Political Culture'', Bukay writes: "This is a culture where rumors are an integral part of social activity, and they quickly become absolute truth that cannot be challenged. It has to do with exaggerations, flights of fancy, and especially, in a society that believes in conspiracies, a society wherein every date is important, that remembers everything and forgives nothing. This is a society wherein the lie is an essential component of behavior patterns, and lying is endorsed by religious sages". <ref name=Culture |
In his book ''Arab-Islamic Political Culture'', Bukay writes: "This is a culture where rumors are an integral part of social activity, and they quickly become absolute truth that cannot be challenged. It has to do with exaggerations, flights of fancy, and especially, in a society that believes in conspiracies, a society wherein every date is important, that remembers everything and forgives nothing. This is a society wherein the lie is an essential component of behavior patterns, and lying is endorsed by religious sages". <ref name=Culture>Bukay, David.{{wayback |url=http://web.archive.org/web/20071205101531/http://www.acpr.org.il/ENGLISH-NATIV/issue1/bukay-1.htm|title="The First Cultural Flaw in Thinking: The Arab Personality"}} , ''NATIV'', Vol. 1, 2003.</ref> | ||
| According to an article in '']'', Bukay also wrote in the same book: “There is no condemnation, no regret, no problem of conscience among Arabs and Muslims, anywhere, in any social stratum, of any social position”. The article further alleges that he distributed a document to his students stating that “when an Arab or a Muslim opens his remarks with the expression wallahi, he is apparently intending to lie”. <ref name=Rappaport |
According to an article in '']'', Bukay also wrote in the same book: “There is no condemnation, no regret, no problem of conscience among Arabs and Muslims, anywhere, in any social stratum, of any social position”. The article further alleges that he distributed a document to his students stating that “when an Arab or a Muslim opens his remarks with the expression wallahi, he is apparently intending to lie”. <ref name=Rappaport>Rappaport, Meron. , '']'', ] ].</ref> | ||
| <!-- ==Criticism== | <!-- ==Criticism== | ||
| The ] alleged that in the 2004-2005 University of Haifa semester Bukay made a number of offensive and anti-Arab remarks in his lectures, including “we should shoot terrorists in the head in front of their families” as a deterrent and “destroy a whole house, with everyone in it,” in order to get rid of one wanted person, that “the Arabs are just alcohol and sex”, and that “the Arabs are stupid and have contributed nothing to humanity.”<ref name=ArabHRA |
The ] alleged that in the 2004-2005 University of Haifa semester Bukay made a number of offensive and anti-Arab remarks in his lectures, including “we should shoot terrorists in the head in front of their families” as a deterrent and “destroy a whole house, with everyone in it,” in order to get rid of one wanted person, that “the Arabs are just alcohol and sex”, and that “the Arabs are stupid and have contributed nothing to humanity.”<ref name=ArabHRA>]. , ], June 2005.{{deadlink}}</ref> Bukay wrote a lengthy article rebutting the claims, insisting that the comments attributed to him had been fabricated.<ref>Bukay, David. , ''NATIV'', Volume 8, October 2005.</ref> The rector of the University conducted his own investigation and concluded that the alleged remarks "were not made in the way they were quoted and parts of sentences that were uttered in different contexts were yoked together by manipulation."<ref name=Rappaport/> | ||
| The AAHR also took issue with a number of statements he made in an article titled "The First Cultural Flaw in Thought: The Arab Character"; the latter were also criticized by the ], which stated they "fall... into the trap of old and hurtful stereotypes, which express prejudices that are liable to be very destructive..."<ref name=Rappaport |
The AAHR also took issue with a number of statements he made in an article titled "The First Cultural Flaw in Thought: The Arab Character"; the latter were also criticized by the ], which stated they "fall... into the trap of old and hurtful stereotypes, which express prejudices that are liable to be very destructive..."<ref name=Rappaport/> | ||
| --> | --> | ||
Revision as of 11:27, 14 December 2009
David Bukay is a Professor of Middle East Studies at the University of Haifa. He is the author of Islamic Fundamentalism and the Arab Political Culture. He specializes in the Arab-Israeli conflict; inter-Arab relations and the Palestinian question; international terrorism and fundamental Islam; theoretical issues and political applications in the Middle-East; Asad's foreign policy towards Israel and Lebanon; the culture approach to understanding the Middle-East.
Views
Bukay is a supporter of the controversial Huntington thesis of the Clash of Civilisations. He argues that there is a wide gap between what he categorises as "Western political culture" and "the Arab-Islamic political culture". Bukay also holds controversial opinions in his own right. In a speech to a conference in Jerusalem 1n 2003, he argued that "the aggressiveness and fanaticism of the Islamic fundamentalism is an existentially lethal phenomenon". He went on to claim that "Islam and democracy are totally incompatible, and are mutually inconclusive. The same applies to Modernity, which is perceived as a threat to Islamic civilization", and that "Leaders and policy-makers in the West refuse to grasp that the Islamic and Palestinian terrorism embodies the SARS decease: Suicide and Ruin Syndrome of democratic society. Until it is understood that this struggle is the war between the Son of Light against the Sons of Darkness, that they represent the invasion of the Huns, in order to destroy modern culture - the world will continue to face an existential more growing threat".
In his book Arab-Islamic Political Culture, Bukay writes: "This is a culture where rumors are an integral part of social activity, and they quickly become absolute truth that cannot be challenged. It has to do with exaggerations, flights of fancy, and especially, in a society that believes in conspiracies, a society wherein every date is important, that remembers everything and forgives nothing. This is a society wherein the lie is an essential component of behavior patterns, and lying is endorsed by religious sages".
According to an article in Haaretz, Bukay also wrote in the same book: “There is no condemnation, no regret, no problem of conscience among Arabs and Muslims, anywhere, in any social stratum, of any social position”. The article further alleges that he distributed a document to his students stating that “when an Arab or a Muslim opens his remarks with the expression wallahi, he is apparently intending to lie”.
Publications
Books
- Total Terrorism in the Name of Allah: The Emergence of the New Islamic Fundamentalists. Shaarei-Tikva: Ariel Center for Policy Research, 2002.
- Arab-Islamic Political Culture. Shaarei-Tikva: Center for Policy Research, 2003.
- Ed.: Muhammad's Monsters: A Comprehensive Guide to Radical Islam for Western Audiences. Green Forest, Ar.: Balfour Books, 2004.
- Arafat, the Palestinian National Movement and Israel: The Politics of Masks and Paradox. New York: Mellen Press, 2005.
- "From Muhammed to Bin Laden: Religious and ideological sources of the homicide bombers phenomenon". New Burnswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2008.
Articles
- Zionists, Post-Zionists and Pseudo-Zionists: The Media Leftist Complex and the al-Aqsa Intifadah, in: S. Sharan (ed.). Israel and the Post-Zionists. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2003.
- The New Islamic Anarchistic Groups, in: D. Bukay. Muhammad’s Monsters.
Notes
- Bukay, David. "Cultural Fallacies in Understanding Islamic Fundamentalism and Palestinian Radicalism", First Jerusalem Summit, October 12-14, 2003.
- Bukay, David.Archived 2007-12-05 at the Wayback Machine , NATIV, Vol. 1, 2003.
- Rappaport, Meron. "In the name of truth", Haaretz, April 28 2005.