| Revision as of 19:46, 15 December 2009 editChildofMidnight (talk | contribs)43,041 edits →Side of bacon: tweak← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:50, 15 December 2009 edit undoChildofMidnight (talk | contribs)43,041 edits tweakNext edit → | ||
| Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
| Please refrain from making comments that will result in my having to give you a spanking. How are your bacon articles coming? Do they eat that kind of thing in Provance? I hope they don't dip it in herb mayo, and I'm not sure it's a good fit for a crepe? Flambe'd bacon? ] (]) 18:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC) | Please refrain from making comments that will result in my having to give you a spanking. How are your bacon articles coming? Do they eat that kind of thing in Provance? I hope they don't dip it in herb mayo, and I'm not sure it's a good fit for a crepe? Flambe'd bacon? ] (]) 18:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :We eat lots of different kinds of cured pork. I have a choucroute alsacienne for tomorrow (to be cooked in Riesling with two potatoes, échine de porc and a knackwurst) and a confit de canard with cassoulet this evening before a Lebanese Christmas Concert in my local church (St John of Malta). I intend to ask one of the Frères about playing ] sometime this week on the organ . In Aix-en-Provence adults do not normally give each other ]. That might work in the South Bay, but not in a town which has been personally visited by ] (admittedly carried here by angels after her death). ] (]) 19:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC) | :We eat lots of different kinds of cured pork. I have a choucroute alsacienne for tomorrow (to be cooked in Riesling with two potatoes, échine de porc and a knackwurst) and a confit de canard with cassoulet this evening before a Lebanese Christmas Concert in my local church (St John of Malta). I intend to ask one of the Frères about playing ] sometime this week on the organ . In Aix-en-Provence adults do not normally give each other ]. That might work in the South Bay, but not in a town which has been personally visited by ] (admittedly carried here by angels after her death). ] (]) 19:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::A little discipline can be beneficial if it helps avoid a bad outcome on ]. Do you prefer the paddle, switch, belt, or open hand? As far as I can tell there is no discipline in the South Bay (or California more generally). It's becoming more and more like ] and Europe here, but with ]s and BBQ instead of ] and ]. :) ] (]) 19:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC) | ::Lovely illustrations in that article. Shouldn't it be translated into the international language? Perhaps it already has? A little discipline can be beneficial if it helps avoid a bad outcome on ]. Do you prefer the paddle, switch, belt, or open hand? As far as I can tell there is no discipline in the South Bay (or California more generally). It's becoming more and more like ] and Europe here, but with ]s and BBQ instead of ] and ]. :) ] (]) 19:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:50, 15 December 2009
 Archives |
|
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII XIX XX |
Jeremy Dunning-Davies
Namaste, Mathsci. This article was deleted following the recent AfD, but was restored for userficiation, then altered and moved back into the mainspace. I was about to delete it under WP:G4 as not overcoming the objections raised in the AfD, but it seems from the article talkpage that other administrators disagree. If you're keen on pursuing this, you might want to discuss the matter with the admins in question, or stick it up for a deletion review or second AfD. Regards, Skomorokh 14:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Race and intelligence
In the past you have expressed a very level-headed approach to this article. There has been a lenghty discussion 9argument) just in the past few days, leading to page protection. I have participated in this discussion but not much, in the past few days, so I don't know what specifically led to the protection. Unimportant. What is important in my mind is the potential for you to review the last few day's talk and identify key issues in content or content politics that you either can clarify, or where you may ask a question that might help antagonistic parties clarify the issue and move towards some way of collaborating smoothly. In any event I think your assessment at this juncture would be constructive. Slrubenstein | Talk 23:59, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Youtube links
Please would you review WP:YOUTUBE and confirm that the links you have added are all free to use (with respect to copyright and any other performace or intellectual property rights), or else remove them. Were you involved with the production of any of those items? If so, please also review WP:COI. Quotient group (talk) 20:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Ronan & Erwan Bouroullec
Your fact checking and tweaking talents are welcome on this design firm from Brittany, if it catches your fancy. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:52, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- I am in California at the moment (and have perhaps flown over you 3 times since Thursday if you're in the South Bay), so I'm otherwise occupied for the time being. Have you tried Elonka? Mathsci (talk) 01:05, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Non. Fine weather for flying. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:23, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Cambridge November meetup
Set for Saturday 14 November, 3 pm, CB2 cybercafé on Norfolk Street. Please come along if you can, Manche-wise: Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Cambridge 5. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Hollywood again
I am confused about the current status of Controversies related to prevalence of Jews in leadership roles in Hollywood - is it still deleted, but the deletion still under review? Or is it still deleted, and the review is over (as most people endorsed the delteion)? Ot has it been un-deleted, and merged with Anti-semitic canard? I consider the third possiblity plausible, although I personally have several caveats about a merger. More importantly, I did not see a consensus for a merger. Even more importantly I do not see any declaration that the review process is over, but maybe I missed something. Can you enlighten me? Slrubenstein | Talk 11:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: my comment about straw man arguments, I think I should have said "red herring" rather than "straw man". I wasn't trying to disparage the case of the academic you raised or to suggest it was a fictional example - indeed, I know people who were taught by her - I just didn't see the relevance of her situation to the AfD. Fences&Windows 23:44, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- The relevance is that in real life there are certain limits, even taboos, and that applies equally well on wikipedia. I think you have expended too much effort arguing about this case. Please don't post messages like this on my talk page again. Mathsci (talk) 05:10, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't intend to cause you offense, my apologies that I seem to have done so. Fences&Windows 03:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you very much for the article you provided from a medical journal. It was extremely helpful for my recent work on the article. Zara1709 (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Topic ban
Mathsci, if you think you have a case which can earn me a topic ban for "disruptive" activity, then I strongly urge you to file a report. I think it's high time this matter be settled, as I'm tiring of this underhanded ad hominen treatment from you and Slrubenstein. I feel confident that any objective observer reviewing the discussion at Talk:Race and intelligence would find that I have not been "disruptive" at all, and that you have consistently assumed bad faith on my part and continue to misrepresent my comments. If this is not the case, and you actually manage to get a neutral editor banned on the grounds that s/he is not willing to help you push your preferred point of view, then I will gladly wash my hands of Misplaced Pages altogether. --Aryaman (talk) 16:05, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Fritelli
Care to have a look at these chestnut fritters to see if I mangled anything? Maybe you can take picture of some next time you're out that way. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:41, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop
As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
MedCabal Case
Hello! My name is Reubzz and I have opened up this mediation cabal case that lists you as a party. Please indicate your acceptance of the mediation process on my talk page and on the case page so we can move quickly towards discussion and resolution of the dispute. The proceedings cannot start unless ALL parties agree to accept the mediation process.
Cheers! Reubzz (talk) 14:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- 6/9 parties have indicated acceptance to proceed. Please indicate your acceptance or rejection here: MedCab Case here - indicate acceptance or rejection of mediation process
Cheers! Reubzz (talk) 20:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Xavexgoem and Wordsmith, one of them a coordinator of the MEDCAB,will be co-mediating. Can I talk you into rejoining the mediation?--Ramdrake (talk) 00:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Bonjour. I have already replied on MEDCAB and, after a good night's sleep when the new mediators have been added to the page, will reinstate myself on the mediation page. Bonne nuit. Mathsci (talk) 00:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Mediation Notice
This is a notice to inform all parties in the MedCabal case involving the article Race and Intelligence, that the deadline for any final comments in this introductory stage of mediation is due within the next 24 hours. At the end of this timeframe, the Mediators will seek page protection for 48 hours to review the entire case and prepare a schedule of issues to discuss to proceed forward. Thank You for your cooperation and acting in good faith to pursue a conclusion to this dispute. Cheers! --Reubzz (talk) 02:22, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:Panier-problog.jpg
File:Panier-problog.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Panier-problog.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Misplaced Pages, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Misplaced Pages, in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:58, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- File:Fort-Saint-Jean.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Fort-Saint-Jean.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 05:14, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Linking to images
File:Example.jpg.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! Mathsci (talk) 09:32, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
A quiet word
Could you please tell me what exactly will satisfy you in this case? A community ban? An apology to_______?( insert name, page group, community). Please just say what you want to happen. You have spent a onsiderable amount of time at ANI this morning. You must have an idea what would make you not how you feel right now. If I can give it to you in ggod conscience, I will.--Die4Dixie (talk) 11:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hello. I'm only one user who's looked at your diffs and tried to unravel what's going on. My advice to you at this stage is not to add any more remarks about "nice Jewish boys", "bagels", statements caricaturing Jews , because this is counterproductive. Please don't try to pin down users by your presumptions on their background. What I have enjoyed least in all this was the process of looking through harrowing photographs on the Yad Vashem site to locate the actual image. Of course, that has nothing to do with you. Perhaps if you took a look at that site yourself it might provide you with some new perspectives in understanding what you might have been writing that has caused offense. Cheers, Mathsci (talk) 12:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- I am sorry, truly, for your unpleasant evening. I will take a little look, and I do regret that I was insensative, and I can see that those pictures, while still having an effect on me, cannot effect me as they have you. I worked with bodies, of course none like those. Seeing the visceral reaction to my lack of sensativity, as well as some really unfortunate remarks directed at me, I should have left comedy out of it. I´ll go look at the pictures, which i assure you will not give me any pleasure, that you can choose to believe or not. For what it is worth, with no disparaging intent שָׁלוֹם.--Die4Dixie (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- It was morning here in France. I note that you have been community banned. As you sow, so shall you reap (Galatians 6:7). Mathsci (talk) 20:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- I am sorry, truly, for your unpleasant evening. I will take a little look, and I do regret that I was insensative, and I can see that those pictures, while still having an effect on me, cannot effect me as they have you. I worked with bodies, of course none like those. Seeing the visceral reaction to my lack of sensativity, as well as some really unfortunate remarks directed at me, I should have left comedy out of it. I´ll go look at the pictures, which i assure you will not give me any pleasure, that you can choose to believe or not. For what it is worth, with no disparaging intent שָׁלוֹם.--Die4Dixie (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Happy Mathsci's Day!
 |
User:Mathsci has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:03, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
YGM Throwaway85 (talk) 07:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Catalog of articles in probability theory
This is a rather unusual article that I'd like to get your expert opinion on. Disclaimer: I've sent it to AfD after a contested prod, but I'm willing to be convinced it could be fixed in some way. Verbal chat 11:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nuclearity
Since you are something of an expert on C* algebras, your input at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nuclearity would be very helpful. Thanks, Sławomir Biały (talk) 14:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know about this. Cheers, Mathsci (talk) 16:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input. I will withdraw my ill-informed recommendation. Sławomir Biały (talk) 16:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry if what I wrote seemed a bit pointed ... Mathsci (talk) 16:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- No, not at all. My own knowledge of C*-algebras is limited to pretty much the very basics. It is certainly news to me (indeed it is surprising) that there is no relationship between the notion of nuclearity for C* algebras and that of other spaces. Sławomir Biały (talk) 17:05, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry if what I wrote seemed a bit pointed ... Mathsci (talk) 16:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input. I will withdraw my ill-informed recommendation. Sławomir Biały (talk) 16:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
R&IQ
please weigh in here:! Slrubenstein | Talk 14:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
A noncommutative pair
Could you look over Connes embedding problem, and noncommutative polynomial? The latter is in the clutches of AfD, suffering as it does from a duff title. Charles Matthews (talk) 17:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, Charles, but I'm a little too busy in RL. Mathsci (talk) 00:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
A personal note
Please take special care not to undo intervening edits in your own reversions. Thanks :). Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry about that! I did try something else, but it didn't seem to work. Mathsci (talk) 20:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Side of bacon
Please refrain from making comments that will result in my having to give you a spanking. How are your bacon articles coming? Do they eat that kind of thing in Provance? I hope they don't dip it in herb mayo, and I'm not sure it's a good fit for a crepe? Flambe'd bacon? ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- We eat lots of different kinds of cured pork. I have a choucroute alsacienne for tomorrow (to be cooked in Riesling with two potatoes, échine de porc and a knackwurst) and a confit de canard with cassoulet this evening before a Lebanese Christmas Concert in my local church (St John of Malta). I intend to ask one of the Frères about playing BWV 642-644 sometime this week on the organ . In Aix-en-Provence adults do not normally give each other fessées. That might work in the South Bay, but not in a town which has been personally visited by Mary Magdalen (admittedly carried here by angels after her death). Mathsci (talk) 19:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Lovely illustrations in that article. Shouldn't it be translated into the international language? Perhaps it already has? A little discipline can be beneficial if it helps avoid a bad outcome on judgment day. Do you prefer the paddle, switch, belt, or open hand? As far as I can tell there is no discipline in the South Bay (or California more generally). It's becoming more and more like Amsterdam and Europe here, but with churros and BBQ instead of croissant and foie gras. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)