Misplaced Pages

User talk:Barkeep49: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:26, 30 December 2009 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,886 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 18:27, 30 December 2009 edit undoTruthanado (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,315 edits please use Reflist templateNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


*Good luck to both of you creating these stubs, and good luck turning them into articles. This is useful stuff! ] (]) 18:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC) *Good luck to both of you creating these stubs, and good luck turning them into articles. This is useful stuff! ] (]) 18:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

:In the future, would you please use the <nowiki>{{Reflist}}</nowiki> template instead of the <nowiki><References /></nowiki> tag in the Reference section. Usage of the template is preferred and has several advantages. Thanks. ] (]) 18:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:27, 30 December 2009

Hey Barkeep! Let's coordinate! I just got an edit conflict with one of your Newbery articles. Which ones do you want me to work on? Shall we split by decades? Joyous! | Talk 16:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Or, since you seem to be trucking along pretty fast, would it be better if I came in behind you and expanded the articles a bit? Joyous! | Talk 16:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Ok. I have a pretty decent reference book here for books up through 2000. I can come along behind you and add a sentence or two of detail to the articles. Joyous! | Talk 16:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

While doing my job as a new article patroller, I have noticed that you and Joyous! are creating several articles about Newbery winners. I am sure there are some in the Misplaced Pages community that would feel that the list of recipients in the Newbery Medal article is sufficient and that each book having its own article is overkill and not encyclopedic. For now, I am going to indicate that each new article has been patrolled, on the basis that each book article should be improved in the future to include at least a basic story line. That is the kind of information our Misplaced Pages users would be looking for, and that is why we are all here, isn't it. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 18:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
In the future, would you please use the {{Reflist}} template instead of the <References /> tag in the Reference section. Usage of the template is preferred and has several advantages. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 18:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)