| Revision as of 01:02, 1 January 2010 editShirik (talk | contribs)18,428 edits →Autoreviewer: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:05, 1 January 2010 edit undoSer Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators6,289,672 edits →CategoriesNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| Happy editing, and keep up the good work! --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 00:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC) | Happy editing, and keep up the good work! --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 00:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :Sure and it's my pleasure - happy new year! --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 01:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Autoreviewer == | == Autoreviewer == | ||
Revision as of 01:05, 1 January 2010
Hey Barkeep! Let's coordinate! I just got an edit conflict with one of your Newbery articles. Which ones do you want me to work on? Shall we split by decades? Joyous! | Talk 16:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Or, since you seem to be trucking along pretty fast, would it be better if I came in behind you and expanded the articles a bit? Joyous! | Talk 16:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Ok. I have a pretty decent reference book here for books up through 2000. I can come along behind you and add a sentence or two of detail to the articles. Joyous! | Talk 16:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- While doing my job as a new article patroller, I have noticed that you and Joyous! are creating several articles about Newbery winners. I am sure there are some in the Misplaced Pages community that would feel that the list of recipients in the Newbery Medal article is sufficient and that each book having its own article is overkill and not encyclopedic. For now, I am going to indicate that each new article has been patrolled, on the basis that each book article should be improved in the future to include at least a basic story line. That is the kind of information our Misplaced Pages users would be looking for, and that is why we are all here, isn't it. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 18:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- Good luck to both of you creating these stubs, and good luck turning them into articles. This is useful stuff! Drmies (talk) 18:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- In the future, would you please use the {{Reflist}} template instead of the <References /> tag in the Reference section. Usage of the template is preferred and has several advantages. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 18:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Deutscher Jugendliteraturpreis assessment
I just wanted to thank you for assessing the article Deutscher Jugendliteraturpreis after a long wait on the Articles for Assessment list. Thank you for your comments, which have been very helpful as I have recently updated and extended the article. The only querie I had was about your third point: formatting the article into a table. While I can see some of the benefits of this, I am not sure how it could be implemented in this particular context. Do you have any suggestions? strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 22:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Categories
Just an FYI - were you aware of Category:Newbery Honor winners (book)? Might be useful to you.
Happy editing, and keep up the good work! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoLo dicono a Signa. 00:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sure and it's my pleasure - happy new year! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoLo dicono a Signa. 01:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Autoreviewer
Hello, and thanks for your contributions. Just so you know, I nominated you for the autoreviewer permission at requests for permissions because you have been creating a significant of valid stubs and seem to have a solid understanding of what is acceptable content at Misplaced Pages. This will help out new page patrollers like myself by preventing your articles from appearing in the "unpatrolled" queue. If you do not want this permission for any reason, you may want to check WP:RFPERM and leave a comment. Thanks for your contributions! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 01:02, 1 January 2010 (UTC)