Misplaced Pages

User talk:BillMasen/old: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:BillMasen Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:11, 3 January 2006 editKarmafist (talk | contribs)13,920 editsNo edit summary  Revision as of 14:46, 3 January 2006 edit undoCobaltbluetony (talk | contribs)30,362 edits David CameronNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{kwelcome}} ] 14:11, 3 January 2006 (UTC) {{kwelcome}} ] 14:11, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

Reagarding the revert to ], while the statement might be seemingly innocent, to add it to a biographical article, as opposed to one that addresses the issues and not the individuals, may indicate a slant on your part, giving the impression of a POV edit. Also, the tone of your statement seems speculative, even if it is a common thought. ] may help support your edit, but overall I wonder if it can hold unless the ] actually does publicize opposition to any of Mr. Cameron's actions. Just my thoughts! - ] 14:46, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:46, 3 January 2006

Welcome!

Hi BillMasen! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! karmafist 14:11, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

David Cameron

Reagarding the revert to your edit of the article David Cameron, while the statement might be seemingly innocent, to add it to a biographical article, as opposed to one that addresses the issues and not the individuals, may indicate a slant on your part, giving the impression of a POV edit. Also, the tone of your statement seems speculative, even if it is a common thought. Sourcing may help support your edit, but overall I wonder if it can hold unless the UKIP actually does publicize opposition to any of Mr. Cameron's actions. Just my thoughts! - CobaltBlueTony 14:46, 3 January 2006 (UTC)