Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ratel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:54, 14 January 2010 editRatel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users12,919 edits →Copperfield: rply← Previous edit Revision as of 00:10, 15 January 2010 edit undoRatel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users12,919 edits →DC: andNext edit →
Line 41: Line 41:
Note that he was vindicated by the police of the rape allegation -- with the allegator being noted by the police as filing other false reports. Placing the allegation in his BLP was clearly wrong. Noting that the accuser was specifically determined to have made false accusations is germane. ] (]) 11:29, 14 January 2010 (UTC) Note that he was vindicated by the police of the rape allegation -- with the allegator being noted by the police as filing other false reports. Placing the allegation in his BLP was clearly wrong. Noting that the accuser was specifically determined to have made false accusations is germane. ] (]) 11:29, 14 January 2010 (UTC)


:How do you know she wasn't set up by a paid agent of the accused? You assume far too much. Her lawyer denies the version of events you have uncritically accepted and her civil case against the accused continues. ] 23:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC) :How do you know she wasn't set up by a paid agent of the accused? You assume far too much. Her lawyer denies the version of events you have uncritically accepted and her civil case against the accused continues. You also say that he was "vindicated by poloce of the rape allegation". Whaaat? Where do you get that from? You need to re-read and , especially:

<blockquote>Investigations may be closed without charges if prosecutors determine there is no federal jurisdiction, no federal laws were broken, or that it would be impossible to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. "Neither the investigation, nor its termination, should be perceived as a comment on guilt or innocence," the statement said.</blockquote>

Editing 101. ] 23:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:10, 15 January 2010


Contents
████████████████████ Ratel's Talk Page ████████████████████


                                            
Contributions by Month
Contributions by Month
User Page User Talk Launch Pad Contact Contribs E-mail Subpages Awards Image Favs Statistics


Welcome to my talk page.
PLEASE READ THE BELOW INFORMATION BEFORE POSTING TO THIS PAGE.

I will reply to you on this page unless you request otherwise. Please watch this page if you comment.

Click HERE to leave a message on this page.

Further, please note:

  • Please use a ==descriptive header== and sign & date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message.
  • Please use ] when mentioning users and pages.
  • I will not reply directly to attacks, innuendo or general incivility. You will be wasting your time if you're here for that. I may however reply via a warning on your own talk page or a report to the Administrators' incident noticeboard. Save your time and mine so that we can both use it to build a better Misplaced Pages.
    • Additionally, if you're a good Wikipedian or catch my attention via your actions throughout Misplaced Pages, you may be awarded by me this Barnstar.
  • Please note that I archive talk posts so if commenting on an old thread from the archives, consider starting a new thread.
  • Please note that I am a "regular". Do not template me as I will surely revert. For more info, refer to WP:DTTR.
  • With all that said, ask away and I'll try and help.

Thanks for visiting! - ► RATEL ◄ 10:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

African Landscape
...so wyd as die Heer se genade

Unified login:Ratel is the unique login of this user for all public Wikimedia projects.

Your comments and my replies:


Hi

You added a "(see below)" phrase to the CPPS article. Do you know the precise reference for the effects of quercetin? If you know the precise link, I can help adding a new reference using labels (or you can do it yourself). Best regards Anonu (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Euthanasia

What happened to the info removed on this edit? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Article was broken into several articles, look at the talk page. ► RATEL ◄ 06:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Oh yes. I have found one of them. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

DC

Note that he was vindicated by the police of the rape allegation -- with the allegator being noted by the police as filing other false reports. Placing the allegation in his BLP was clearly wrong. Noting that the accuser was specifically determined to have made false accusations is germane. Collect (talk) 11:29, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

How do you know she wasn't set up by a paid agent of the accused? You assume far too much. Her lawyer denies the version of events you have uncritically accepted and her civil case against the accused continues. You also say that he was "vindicated by poloce of the rape allegation". Whaaat? Where do you get that from? You need to re-read and , especially:

Investigations may be closed without charges if prosecutors determine there is no federal jurisdiction, no federal laws were broken, or that it would be impossible to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. "Neither the investigation, nor its termination, should be perceived as a comment on guilt or innocence," the statement said.

Editing 101. ► RATEL ◄ 23:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)