Revision as of 14:39, 17 December 2009 editKope (talk | contribs)2,097 edits →Chang's conjecture: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:11, 18 January 2010 edit undoAsh (talk | contribs)23,897 edits →Using Google Scholar hits or similar: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Yes, I plan to add material and re-organize that page. Not very soon, though. Currently I am visiting a different university and am busy with other things. Cheers. ] (]) 14:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC) | Yes, I plan to add material and re-organize that page. Not very soon, though. Currently I am visiting a different university and am busy with other things. Cheers. ] (]) 14:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Using Google Scholar hits or similar == | |||
Hi, if you check out ] there is a reasonable discussion about these sorts of sources. These are excluded from articles on the basis of ] and ]. You can, of course, use the information to support a discussion about notability on the article talk page. In the case of ] it may be better to find international awards for his work or independent reviews of his books as sources to add. Cheers—] (]) 12:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:11, 18 January 2010
Welcome!
Hi Tkuvho! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Hi! Remember to add references to your page or the content in question may be deleted. Good luck and happy editing--Pianoplonkers (talk) 16:48, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk pages
We usually permit people to remove comments they have made from talk pages, as long as nobody else has responded to the comment. Of course the edits are still in the page history either way. There's not any overriding need to prevent people from retracting a statement that they later feel was ill considered. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Chang's conjecture
Yes, I plan to add material and re-organize that page. Not very soon, though. Currently I am visiting a different university and am busy with other things. Cheers. Kope (talk) 14:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Using Google Scholar hits or similar
Hi, if you check out Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Can Google hit counts ever be cited as a reliable source? there is a reasonable discussion about these sorts of sources. These are excluded from articles on the basis of SYNTH and OR. You can, of course, use the information to support a discussion about notability on the article talk page. In the case of Steve Shnider it may be better to find international awards for his work or independent reviews of his books as sources to add. Cheers—Ash (talk) 12:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC)