Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jahiegel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:57, 5 January 2010 editJahiegel (talk | contribs)13,228 edits archive box← Previous edit Revision as of 04:16, 19 January 2010 edit undoEveryking (talk | contribs)155,603 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 31: Line 31:
<br> <br>
<!--Please place messages below this line; thanks in advance!--> <!--Please place messages below this line; thanks in advance!-->

==RfA==
I tried to sleep but couldn't, so I got up and saw your vote. That request stemmed largely from frustration over my last RfA, in which I was subjected to some fairly extreme attacks, and was based on the idea that, because the ArbCom itself desysopped me (thereby producing a certain level of opposition in all subsequent RfAs, just by virtue of that decision), and considering that the RfA was quite close to passing (even under those circumstances), the ArbCom should either resysop me or make some kind of statement that its past decision shouldn't reflect on my capacity to do the job at that time. It was probably misguided (as a few people advised me at the time), but that was my reasoning. ] (]) 04:16, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:16, 19 January 2010

Template:Archive box collapsible

This is the user talk page for User:Jahiegel, where you can send messages and comments to Jahiegel.


RfA

I tried to sleep but couldn't, so I got up and saw your vote. That request stemmed largely from frustration over my last RfA, in which I was subjected to some fairly extreme attacks, and was based on the idea that, because the ArbCom itself desysopped me (thereby producing a certain level of opposition in all subsequent RfAs, just by virtue of that decision), and considering that the RfA was quite close to passing (even under those circumstances), the ArbCom should either resysop me or make some kind of statement that its past decision shouldn't reflect on my capacity to do the job at that time. It was probably misguided (as a few people advised me at the time), but that was my reasoning. Everyking (talk) 04:16, 19 January 2010 (UTC)