Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:48, 23 January 2010 editStephan Schulz (talk | contribs)Administrators26,888 edits →Suspected sockpuppets: Add one← Previous edit Revision as of 07:49, 23 January 2010 edit undoStephan Schulz (talk | contribs)Administrators26,888 edits →Evidence submitted by Hipocrite: Add oneNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
As normal. Now engaging in vandalism to prop up his comrades in arms. As normal. Now engaging in vandalism to prop up his comrades in arms.



======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>======

Added {{u|Lorast}}. Typical MoO, typical topics, typical language. --] (]) 07:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>======

Revision as of 07:49, 23 January 2010

Scibaby

Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.


Report date January 22 2010, 21:04 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Hipocrite

As normal. Now engaging in vandalism to prop up his comrades in arms.


Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz

Added Lorast. Typical MoO, typical topics, typical language. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

Almost certainly not Scibaby. Please decline checkuser. -Atmoz (talk) 21:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Who could it be, then? Hipocrite (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: B  + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by Hipocrite (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Any reason why this cannot be handled directly by AIV? Tim Song (talk) 21:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

The immediate vandalism could. However, SciBaby (or whichever of the anti-science sockmasters is running this ipsock) typically run hoardes of sleeper accounts. Discovering those is the real goal. Hipocrite (talk) 21:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 Additional information needed Could you please elaborate upon why you think the IP is Scibaby's? Regards, Spitfire 21:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Absolutly. He's demonstrated a desire to help out his co-warriors about global warming. He's demonstrated an utter disregard for the encyclopedia, and given the immediate knowledge of terms like "WP:IAR" he's obviously someone's sock. The most frequent anti-AGW sockmaster is Scibaby, thus, this IP is probably Scibaby. Hipocrite (talk) 21:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Categories: