Revision as of 16:12, 7 February 2010 editUkexpat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers115,264 edits WPBS← Previous edit |
Revision as of 19:04, 10 February 2010 edit undoUkexpat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers115,264 edits →Minor grammatical nitpick: new sectionNext edit → |
Line 47: |
Line 47: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{dyktalk|7 February|2010|{{*mp}}... that ] ''']''' spent more time in combat than any other American pilot in ] and also served in the ]?}} |
|
{{dyktalk|7 February|2010|{{*mp}}... that ] ''']''' spent more time in combat than any other American pilot in ] and also served in the ]?}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Minor grammatical nitpick == |
|
|
|
|
|
In the later life section, I have twice corrected "was survived" to "is survived". The latter is most definitely correct - they are still live so they survive him (present tense), therefore, he is survived by them (present tense). I also corrected "preceded him in death" (which sounds like something from a tombstone) to the less euphemistic "predeceased". – ] (]) 19:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
In the later life section, I have twice corrected "was survived" to "is survived". The latter is most definitely correct - they are still live so they survive him (present tense), therefore, he is survived by them (present tense). I also corrected "preceded him in death" (which sounds like something from a tombstone) to the less euphemistic "predeceased". – ukexpat (talk) 19:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)