Revision as of 14:52, 26 November 2009 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Kanguole/Archive 1.← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:52, 11 February 2010 edit undoElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,960 edits clarificationNext edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
''']:''' {{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Archive index|], }} {{Archive list|nobr=yes|root={{FULLPAGENAME}}}} | ''']:''' {{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Archive index|], }} {{Archive list|nobr=yes|root={{FULLPAGENAME}}}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Clarification== | |||
Hi Kanguole, sorry for any confusion, but it's probably best to ignore anything that Per Honor et Gloria says. He was actually completely banned from editing in the topic area of medieval history for over a year, for POV-pushing and misrepresenting sources, especially at the Franco-Mongol alliance article. His ban has since expired, but he seems to be back, and it looks like a new ban may be necessary. :/ If you'd like more info, see ]. --]]] 18:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:52, 11 February 2010
Welcome to Kanguole's talk page.
|
Clarification
Hi Kanguole, sorry for any confusion, but it's probably best to ignore anything that Per Honor et Gloria says. He was actually completely banned from editing in the topic area of medieval history for over a year, for POV-pushing and misrepresenting sources, especially at the Franco-Mongol alliance article. His ban has since expired, but he seems to be back, and it looks like a new ban may be necessary. :/ If you'd like more info, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Franco-Mongol alliance. --Elonka 18:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)