| Revision as of 16:00, 15 February 2010 editFladrif (talk | contribs)6,136 edits →TM Sockdrawer - ArbCom Next?: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:35, 15 February 2010 edit undoMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,094 edits →Arbitration notice: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
| Per your comment on SPI, Checkuser ] has now the widespread Fairfield/MUM/TM-Org sockpuppetry/meatpuppetry. I've asked Will Beback , who commenced the SPI, what's the next step in this process.] (]) 16:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | Per your comment on SPI, Checkuser ] has now the widespread Fairfield/MUM/TM-Org sockpuppetry/meatpuppetry. I've asked Will Beback , who commenced the SPI, what's the next step in this process.] (]) 16:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == ] notice == | |||
| You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— | |||
| * ]; | |||
| * ]. | |||
| Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> –] 19:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:35, 15 February 2010
| This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
 |
|---|
| 24 December 2024 |
|
For older history, check as well as the archives.
Dad's Army board game
(moved to Talk:Criticism of eBay)
Kearney's back!
Have a nice day! Kearney Zzyzwicz (talk) 09:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Your "Ironically" section on you userpage
Made me laugh. Thanks! Throwaway85 (talk) 12:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Defender 911
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Defender 911 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, ♠TomasBat 01:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Glad this got taken care of so easily. --jpgordon 19:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Sock
Hello, I apologize for the account creation. I just wanted to edit the Mohammad al Durah article under another name. I shoudn't have done that. Sorry. TwoHorned (talk) 18:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Apology accepted; I hope you understand why the use of multiple accounts is not appreciated in a consensus-based community like this. --jpgordon 19:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Is it possible to destroy the account I created, I don't mean to use it ever. Thanks again. TwoHorned (talk)
- Nope. --jpgordon 21:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Is it possible to destroy the account I created, I don't mean to use it ever. Thanks again. TwoHorned (talk)
User:Nauneim
Stop me if I'm wrong, but isn't this account a sockpuppet of User:Iaaasi? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yup. I misread checkuser results. --jpgordon 00:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
King-Macca
Either User:Watchover or User:KAPITALIST88 (both are at the "Stravin" SPI for reference's sake). Orderinchaos 17:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
How??
HOW????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Howdoyouknowitsme (talk • contribs) 22:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you. --jpgordon 22:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
re User:YourBrain being blocked for socking
Are you prepared to confirm whether YourBrain was editing from a Texas location? LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:56, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- One of the three IPs involved was Texas, yes. The other two were same ISP, different location. --jpgordon 00:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. LessHeard vanU (talk) 01:17, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Oversight
Are you around to do a quick one? -- Flyguy649 16:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not really up to date on oversight policy or procedure now. --jpgordon 17:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- No worries, I found someone. -- Flyguy649 17:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
User:Sweetpoet
Hi, I noticed you handled this editor's recent unblock request. After noticing some poor quality edits by the editor at a different article (Jehovah's Witnesses), I found the telephone article they'd also substantially contributed to, which has many problems regarding encyclopedic tone and presentation. I performed a copyedit of the article, but the editor objected, claiming the copyedit was vandalism, and reverted the article to their previous version. The editor is proving difficult to deal with in discussion, and also attempted to provoke me via Misplaced Pages's e-mail function. Could you please take a look at the discussion on the editor's Talk page?--Jeffro77 (talk) 05:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Good luck with this. --jpgordon 15:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
TM Sockdrawer - ArbCom Next?
Per your comment on SPI, Checkuser User:Dominic has now confirmed the widespread Fairfield/MUM/TM-Org sockpuppetry/meatpuppetry. I've asked Will Beback , who commenced the SPI, what's the next step in this process.Fladrif (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Arbitration notice
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Transcendental Meditation movement and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, –MuZemike 19:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC)