| Revision as of 00:19, 3 January 2006 edit172.184.131.229 (talk) →Changes← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:29, 9 January 2006 edit undoBrianH123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users545 editsm reorganizedNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| This article had a strong bias towards quasi-feminist views of the facial--that a facial always represents subjugation of women and so on. That's a fringe view of (mostly male) feminist academics. I have rewritten the article to make it more balanced, but the quasi-feminist view is still represented. In addition some of the article was poorly written and I tried to clean that up--a facial is an ejaculation, not a depositing. If you drip semen from a cup onto someone's face, you may have deposited semen but you haven't given a facial. Thanks. | This article had a strong bias towards quasi-feminist views of the facial--that a facial always represents subjugation of women and so on. That's a fringe view of (mostly male) feminist academics. I have rewritten the article to make it more balanced, but the quasi-feminist view is still represented. In addition some of the article was poorly written and I tried to clean that up--a facial is an ejaculation, not a depositing. If you drip semen from a cup onto someone's face, you may have deposited semen but you haven't given a facial. Thanks. | ||
| =="Disrespectful"?== | |||
| ==Anon== | |||
| Here is a quote from this article: | Here is a quote from this article: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Some people consider this act disrespectful to the person on the receiving end, although some people do receive sexual pleasure from it, and some claim that since the human face is an amalgam of our most unique physical characteristics - it is an expression of the desire to copulate directly with the most intimate part of one's partner. Whether it is really an act of disrespect depends on the mutual perceptions and intentions of the participants. | Some people consider this act disrespectful to the person on the receiving end, although some people do receive sexual pleasure from it, and some claim that since the human face is an amalgam of our most unique physical characteristics - it is an expression of the desire to copulate directly with the most intimate part of one's partner. Whether it is really an act of disrespect depends on the mutual perceptions and intentions of the participants. | ||
| What do you believe? | What do you believe? | ||
| ⚫ | Does anyone know where there is related information (book, webpage, other) similar to this article. | ||
| i think this line | i think this line | ||
| Line 18: | Line 16: | ||
| is a little 'disrespectful' towards people who don't enjoy the act - it doesn't make them conservative, it just means they may not like it ! | is a little 'disrespectful' towards people who don't enjoy the act - it doesn't make them conservative, it just means they may not like it ! | ||
| ==Related information?== | |||
| ⚫ | Does anyone know where there is related information (book, webpage, other) similar to this article. | ||
| ==Substitute sex act?== | |||
| It is OK to consider this act as a substitute sex act for those girls who are not yet ready to engage in other sexual activities. In my experience most girls like to remain passive while ejaculation on their face is occuring, mostly to avoid other areas, specially their hair, from receiving the semen | It is OK to consider this act as a substitute sex act for those girls who are not yet ready to engage in other sexual activities. In my experience most girls like to remain passive while ejaculation on their face is occuring, mostly to avoid other areas, specially their hair, from receiving the semen | ||
| ==Pictures?== | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | What, no picture to accompany the article? How are we young'uns supposed to learn if there are no visuals for reference? Tut. Sigh. Off now to watch more porn. Bye. | ||
| :I don't really think sarcasm is necessary here. As for no picture, I think the description is more than adequate ] 20:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Removal of link == | == Removal of link == | ||
Revision as of 04:29, 9 January 2006
Changes
This article had a strong bias towards quasi-feminist views of the facial--that a facial always represents subjugation of women and so on. That's a fringe view of (mostly male) feminist academics. I have rewritten the article to make it more balanced, but the quasi-feminist view is still represented. In addition some of the article was poorly written and I tried to clean that up--a facial is an ejaculation, not a depositing. If you drip semen from a cup onto someone's face, you may have deposited semen but you haven't given a facial. Thanks.
"Disrespectful"?
Here is a quote from this article:
Some people consider this act disrespectful to the person on the receiving end, although some people do receive sexual pleasure from it, and some claim that since the human face is an amalgam of our most unique physical characteristics - it is an expression of the desire to copulate directly with the most intimate part of one's partner. Whether it is really an act of disrespect depends on the mutual perceptions and intentions of the participants. What do you believe?
i think this line
"The people that claim a facial is "disrespectul" and don't engage in it however, are most likely very conservative people who refuse to explore and experience in life."
is a little 'disrespectful' towards people who don't enjoy the act - it doesn't make them conservative, it just means they may not like it !
Related information?
Does anyone know where there is related information (book, webpage, other) similar to this article.
Substitute sex act?
It is OK to consider this act as a substitute sex act for those girls who are not yet ready to engage in other sexual activities. In my experience most girls like to remain passive while ejaculation on their face is occuring, mostly to avoid other areas, specially their hair, from receiving the semen
Pictures?
What, no picture to accompany the article? How are we young'uns supposed to learn if there are no visuals for reference? Tut. Sigh. Off now to watch more porn. Bye.
- I don't really think sarcasm is necessary here. As for no picture, I think the description is more than adequate Welshy 20:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Removal of link
Removed the link to Facials. It is a pay site and not really relavent to the page as the topic is description of the act, not the act in pornography as such Welshy 20:16, 21 December 2005 (UTC)