| Revision as of 06:40, 27 February 2010 editBlablaaa (talk | contribs)2,430 edits →nope← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:29, 27 February 2010 edit undoBlablaaa (talk | contribs)2,430 edits →nopeNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :: changed your edit. its not even the correct place for this sci fi figures, u can discuss in the article and no in a "ref" because the ref their doesnt support the figures above... ] (]) 06:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | :: changed your edit. its not even the correct place for this sci fi figures, u can discuss in the article and no in a "ref" because the ref their doesnt support the figures above... ] (]) 06:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| what did u not understand? that this source is not a relaible source or that your "footnote" is at the wrong place because its a ref for other numbers. what did u miss? , i will change again because u ref numbers with a sentence which contradicts this refs. thats simply wrong. put it somewhere else but not behind this numbers. this number are krivosheev and your number contradic this. please try to understand what i explained now to u, even when my english is terrible ] (]) 07:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:29, 27 February 2010
Archive 1 Jan 2007 - Feb 2008
Archive 2 Feb 2008 - Dec 2009
Type 63
I have whacked the page under WP:CSD G12. You can now recreate a stub at your leisure. Please alert me of any similar copyvios you notice - we need to be careful about this. Thanks and Happy New Year! Buckshot06 (talk) 09:27, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
nope
"official soviet surces" arent reliable, they "update" their numbers with every book. this sources arent reliable, and iam sure thats a fact on wiki, so there is no need to include them in the article. iam no censor, i only deleted fantasy numbers from an article Blablaaa (talk) 06:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- changed your edit. its not even the correct place for this sci fi figures, u can discuss in the article and no in a "ref" because the ref their doesnt support the figures above... Blablaaa (talk) 06:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
what did u not understand? that this source is not a relaible source or that your "footnote" is at the wrong place because its a ref for other numbers. what did u miss? , i will change again because u ref numbers with a sentence which contradicts this refs. thats simply wrong. put it somewhere else but not behind this numbers. this number are krivosheev and your number contradic this. please try to understand what i explained now to u, even when my english is terrible Blablaaa (talk) 07:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)