Misplaced Pages

User talk:Punk-Lova: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:58, 10 January 2006 editPunk-Lova (talk | contribs)310 edits →Image licensing← Previous edit Revision as of 23:32, 10 January 2006 edit undoJkelly (talk | contribs)19,608 editsm →Image licensing: no copyright?Next edit →
Line 28: Line 28:


That image was not copyrighted. ] 22:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC) That image was not copyrighted. ] 22:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

:Hi, ]. A claim that the image of a recently-released book cover is not ]ed is pretty difficult to believe. Does the book come from a publisher involved in some radical new approach to licensing, or is it possible that you may be confused about United States copyright law? In either case, without any evidence to the contrary, ] is quite right that we cannot accept images that have no copyright information. Thanks for understanding. ] 23:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:32, 10 January 2006

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, Punk-Lova

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some handy tips:

  • You can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~
  • Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date.
  • If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.

Jokermage 22:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

SYWtBaW

Help me in writting the sypnosis of So You Want to be a Wizard

I'd rather edit after the fact -- I'll keep an eye on it. :-)--SarekOfVulcan 00:07, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Image licensing

I don't want to WP:BITE, but next time you try to release someone else's copyrighted work into the public domain, I'm speedying it. Please read up on Image use more carefully before uploading another image. Thanks.--SarekOfVulcan 22:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

That image was not copyrighted. Punk-Lova 22:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi, User:Punk-Lova. A claim that the image of a recently-released book cover is not copyrighted is pretty difficult to believe. Does the book come from a publisher involved in some radical new approach to licensing, or is it possible that you may be confused about United States copyright law? In either case, without any evidence to the contrary, User:SarekOfVulcan is quite right that we cannot accept images that have no copyright information. Thanks for understanding. Jkelly 23:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)