Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:29, 2 March 2010 editHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 23:24, 2 March 2010 edit undoStephan Schulz (talk | contribs)Administrators26,888 edits →Suspected sockpuppets: Added oneNext edit →
Line 82: Line 82:
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>======
* {{checkuser|1=Junder1234}}. Perhaps a slight deviation from the standard pattern. ] (]) 21:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC) * {{checkuser|1=Junder1234}}. Perhaps a slight deviation from the standard pattern. ] (]) 21:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
* {{checkuser|1=Evan Marriott}}. No deviation at all. --] (]) 23:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

<!-- Please duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> <!-- Please duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->



======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>======

Revision as of 23:24, 2 March 2010

Scibaby

Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.

Report date February 27 2010, 13:14 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Tony Sidaway

The usual pattern. --TS 13:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Prolog

Added User:Wilson and Two and User:Fred Gharria. Prolog (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

...and User:Moral Equivalent and User:Titulartitle. Prolog (talk) 05:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
...and User:AnodeRays. Prolog (talk) 08:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Evidence submitted by Short Brigade Harvester Boris

User:Goodranch is somebody's sock, though perhaps not Scibaby. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 17:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by ChrisO

Added User:David Crabtree, which looks very much like another Scibaby sock. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:43, 27 February 2010 (UTC)


Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz

Added User:Clarke Simpson, obvious from topics and language. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 04:29, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by TS 13:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

 Clerk endorsed Elockid ·Contribs) 17:47, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

There are three groups here:
  • First, all are  Confirmed Scibaby socks but David Crabtree and Goodranch.
  • Goodranch is  Confirmed Reef Bonanza and Burns007. This group is possibly related to Scibaby.
  • Finally, it is  Likely David Crabtree = DaleEastman. These are unrelated to Scibaby.
Dominic·t 10:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm not convinced by the behavioral evidence that the other remaining ones are Scibaby. –MuZemike 04:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Correction/clarification: I've indefinitely blocked Goodranch, Reef Bonanza, and Burns007 as socks of each other but as of Scibaby. I still remain doubtful on Crabtree and Eastman being Scibaby socks. –MuZemike 19:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.

{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.


Report date March 2 2010, 21:29 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Hipocrite

Hipocrite (talk) 21:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by Hipocrite (talk) 21:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


Categories: