Misplaced Pages

Thanks Bksimonb (talk) 10:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

OTRS and AFD

FRANAMAX posted the ticket number, and I cannot find the correspondence where it was first given. And as for your oppose, I respect it, and can only asure you that if I were in any way involved in an AFD discussion, I would never close it. Schmidt, 22:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Volume of deletions

Can I suggest that you slow down on the deletions by spacing them out over several weeks instead of putting out so many at people are overwhelmed and don't have time to be voting, discussing, improving etc? - Stillwaterising (talk) 05:02, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

You obviosly have had time to look at this and reply. Is there a reason you ignored this? - Stillwaterising (talk) 20:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh, that's an oops on my part. If you check back through my edits over the past few days, you'll notice that I have made few, if any, deletion nominations. NW (Talk) 20:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure if an occasion to nominate a group of bios like the Playmates will come up again, but the more reasonable thing would seem to limit an editor to no more than 7 a week unless there's a good reason then it should go under CSD. - Stillwaterising (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

New Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi-related AN/I

Hi, just noticed you at AN/I. When you have a free mo', could you just check over this AN/I thread? Many thanks, eric. Esowteric+Talk 16:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Sheesh

Thanks for archiving that ... did I contact you off-Wiki, too, and ask you to do that? :/ SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

No problem :/ NW (Talk) 01:02, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

It ain't over 'til the fat lady sings; SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

If that is Mattisse, and she's doing that, well, not only is she resetting the clock for a comeback request, she may be putting a bullet in it. I object when I perceive she is receiving unfair treatment, but is she does it to herself, well, she used the second bullet on her own foot. Say Lah Vee, or whatever.--Wehwalt (talk) 01:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

WP:Sock Applications

I just ran into User_talk:99.149.87.66, and after he pretty much said he's using multiple accounts I informed him of guidelines. However, he responded saying it's not against policy, and I quite honestly don't understand policy well enough to be of any help. What do you think? NativeForeigner /_Contribs/ 05:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

What he's doing is technically fine per policy (or at least not terribly wrong), although I really don't understand why he would be doing it... NW (Talk) 18:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's fairly bizarre. One would think they would make controversial edits using an IP... NativeForeigner /_Contribs/ 22:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

BLP sticky prod

Hi NuclearWarfare ! The template workshop has now split off most of the long threads purely on policy to a new discussion page so that policy can be established while technical development of the template can continue in its own space. When the template functions are finalised, the policy bits can be merged into them. If you intend to continue to contribute your ideas to the development of the template or its policy of use, and we hope you will, please consider either adding your name to the list of workshop members, or joining in with the policy discussions on the new page. --Kudpung (talk) 06:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Is it possible

to protect this. Somebody changed my comments, which I did not notice before. I changed it back to the way it was in archive. They were changed again. I would apretiate, if you are to protect my version. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:41, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Your comments were changed, as you were told and warned by an admin as they were personal attacks. Per WP:TPO, they have been removed, as they were personal attacks.— Dædαlus 23:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC)