Revision as of 18:30, 23 March 2010 view sourceSophie means wisdom (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,822 editsm rm redundant word - all wikis are websites, aren't they?← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:01, 23 March 2010 view source Nx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users587 editsm Added {{notability}} tag to article using FriendlyNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{notability|Web|date=March 2010}} | |||
{{disputed|date=March 2010}} | {{disputed|date=March 2010}} | ||
{{Infobox Website | {{Infobox Website |
Revision as of 19:01, 23 March 2010
The topic of this article may not meet Misplaced Pages's notability guideline for web content. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. Find sources: "RationalWiki" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (March 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Type of site | Satirical wiki |
---|---|
Available in | English |
URL | http://rationalwiki.com |
Commercial | No |
Registration | Optional |
RationalWiki is a wiki that features content which, among other things, is satirical of and criticizes Conservapedia, its founder Andrew Schlafly, and its administrators. It also contains satirical articles on subjects related to Conservapedia's Conservative Christian viewpoint such as young earth creationism. The site's purpose as stated on its home page is:
1. Analyzing and refuting the anti-science movement.
2. Analyzing and refuting crank ideas.
3. Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism.
History
RationalWiki was founded in 2007 by Peter Lipson, a doctor of internal medicine in response to his account on Conservapedia being blocked as a result of him attempting to include evidence in Conservapedia's breast cancer article against Conservapedia's statement linking abortion as a major cause of the disease (a statement which is based on selective evidence but goes against scientific consensus).
External links
References
- Simon, Stephanie (2007-06-22). "A conservative's answer to Misplaced Pages". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2007-11-02.