| Revision as of 19:00, 14 January 2006 editHogeye (talk | contribs)3,004 edits property is also liberty← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:46, 15 January 2006 edit undoCadr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,444 edits Proudhon did oppose the modern concept of private propertyNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Taken at face value, "Property is theft!" appears to be an ], because theft, by definition, means depriving someone of his property. However, Proudhon had his own specialized definition of property in ''What is Property''. By property, he was referring to government-granted title to idle and unoccupied land. Proudhon opposed the idea of an individual owning land that he was not using, as this would enable him to charge rent to others and thereby be paid without laboring. In addition to opposing individual ownership of idle land, he opposed the idea of social ownership as well: "instead of inferring from this that property should be shared by all, I demand, as a measure of general security, its entire abolition." For Proudhon, individuals may rightfully "occupy and use" land, but not restrict others from using land or charge rent to use land that they are not themselves putting to use. | Taken at face value, "Property is theft!" appears to be an ], because theft, by definition, means depriving someone of his property. However, Proudhon had his own specialized definition of property in ''What is Property''. By property, he was referring to government-granted title to idle and unoccupied land. Proudhon opposed the idea of an individual owning land that he was not using, as this would enable him to charge rent to others and thereby be paid without laboring. In addition to opposing individual ownership of idle land, he opposed the idea of social ownership as well: "instead of inferring from this that property should be shared by all, I demand, as a measure of general security, its entire abolition." For Proudhon, individuals may rightfully "occupy and use" land, but not restrict others from using land or charge rent to use land that they are not themselves putting to use. | ||
| Proudhon did not oppose property in the sense of individual ownership of the product of one's labor. He used the term ] to describe his vision of a society where individuals and democratic workers associations could trade their produce on the market. In this system, he supposes exchange value to be determined by the amount of labor required to produce a commodity, in line with the ]. | Proudhon did not oppose property in the sense of individual ownership of the product of one's labor. He used the term ] to describe his vision of a society where individuals and democratic workers associations could trade their produce on the market. In this system, he supposes exchange value to be determined by the amount of labor required to produce a commodity, in line with the ]. Concerning the relationship between property and liberty, he wrote: | ||
| Many misinterpret Proudhon's "property is theft" to mean he opposed private property; however, he only opposed property status as decreed by States. Proudhon attempted to clear up this misunderstanding when he later wrote: | |||
| <blockquote>"Property a triumph of Liberty. For it is born of Liberty ... Property is the only power that can act as a counterweight to the State, because it shows no reverence for princes, rebels against society and is, in short, anarchist." </blockquote> | <blockquote>"Property a triumph of Liberty. For it is born of Liberty ... Property is the only power that can act as a counterweight to the State, because it shows no reverence for princes, rebels against society and is, in short, anarchist." </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 08:46, 15 January 2006
Property is theft! is a slogan coined by the French anarchist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon in his book What is Property? Or, an Inquiry into the Principle of Right of Government.
Taken at face value, "Property is theft!" appears to be an oxymoron, because theft, by definition, means depriving someone of his property. However, Proudhon had his own specialized definition of property in What is Property. By property, he was referring to government-granted title to idle and unoccupied land. Proudhon opposed the idea of an individual owning land that he was not using, as this would enable him to charge rent to others and thereby be paid without laboring. In addition to opposing individual ownership of idle land, he opposed the idea of social ownership as well: "instead of inferring from this that property should be shared by all, I demand, as a measure of general security, its entire abolition." For Proudhon, individuals may rightfully "occupy and use" land, but not restrict others from using land or charge rent to use land that they are not themselves putting to use.
Proudhon did not oppose property in the sense of individual ownership of the product of one's labor. He used the term mutualism to describe his vision of a society where individuals and democratic workers associations could trade their produce on the market. In this system, he supposes exchange value to be determined by the amount of labor required to produce a commodity, in line with the labor theory of value. Concerning the relationship between property and liberty, he wrote:
"Property a triumph of Liberty. For it is born of Liberty ... Property is the only power that can act as a counterweight to the State, because it shows no reverence for princes, rebels against society and is, in short, anarchist."
See also
- Pierre-Joseph Proudhon
- Mutualism (economic theory)
- Libertarian socialism
- Property
- Private property
- What is Property?