Misplaced Pages

Talk:Yom Kippur War/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Yom Kippur War Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:00, 30 March 2010 editUsrules (talk | contribs)30 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 08:03, 30 March 2010 edit undoUsrules (talk | contribs)30 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
* Point to the "coincidence" of the attack and Soviet intervention with the apex of the Watergate crisis (this is mention briefly). Not sure this is of great importance in this article. * Point to the "coincidence" of the attack and Soviet intervention with the apex of the Watergate crisis (this is mention briefly). Not sure this is of great importance in this article.
* <s>Overall the article is NOT objective & is extremely biased towards Israel. It lacks many key facts that did strongly shake the Israeli (US Adopted) military superiority, especially during the first week of the war</s>. The Israeli / US surprise is mentioned several times. * <s>Overall the article is NOT objective & is extremely biased towards Israel. It lacks many key facts that did strongly shake the Israeli (US Adopted) military superiority, especially during the first week of the war</s>. The Israeli / US surprise is mentioned several times.
* Try to find reliable sources that detail the war specifically on the Golan Heights from the Syrian and/or Iraqi retrospective - (This may be difficult to accomplish given the open nature of Israeli society which tolerates internal discussion and criticism as opposed to the regimes in Syria / Iraq which do not). * The Sinai war is discussed extensively while the Golan front is mentioned only briefly. Need to elaborate on the latter.
* (Try to find reliable sources that detail the war specifically on the Golan Heights from the Syrian and/or Iraqi retrospective) - This may be difficult to accomplish given the open nature of Israeli society which tolerates internal discussion and criticism as opposed to the regimes in Syria / Iraq which do not.
* <s>consider ways of including other perspectives besides Israeli (ie, instead of addressing Arab countries and their actions as they affected Israel)</s> The Arab state's perspective is already discussed in detail. * <s>consider ways of including other perspectives besides Israeli (ie, instead of addressing Arab countries and their actions as they affected Israel)</s> The Arab state's perspective is already discussed in detail.
* <s>In the lead, Summarize the phases of the war for each front.</s> * <s>In the lead, Summarize the phases of the war for each front.</s>
* The Sinai war is discussed extensively while the Golan front is mentioned only briefly. Need to elaborate on the latter.
* Point to peace initiatives from Sadat <s>in 1971</s> and in February 1973 - They both where rejected by Golda Meir government <s> leaving no choice to the Egyptians to get in the war</s>. * Point to peace initiatives from Sadat <s>in 1971</s> and in February 1973 - They both where rejected by Golda Meir government <s> leaving no choice to the Egyptians to get in the war</s>.
*<s>It isn't emphasized that by the time the Khartoum Arab summit issued the "three no's" Israel had already refused the peace iniativies that required it to leave the Sinai and the Golan Heights. Maybe someone could just add "After Egypt and Syria realized they could not regain their territories diplomatically" before the sentence that starts "the Khartoum Arab Summit issued..." instead of "However." The "three no's" were mostly meaningless pandering to Arab populations. Egypt was not going to accept peace with Israel as long as Israel occupied the Sinai, so by the the time the "three no's" were issued it didn't carry much diplomatic meaning</s>. (The facts are mentioned in the article. Please refrain from introducing biased emphases in the article). *<s>It isn't emphasized that by the time the Khartoum Arab summit issued the "three no's" Israel had already refused the peace iniativies that required it to leave the Sinai and the Golan Heights. Maybe someone could just add "After Egypt and Syria realized they could not regain their territories diplomatically" before the sentence that starts "the Khartoum Arab Summit issued..." instead of "However." The "three no's" were mostly meaningless pandering to Arab populations. Egypt was not going to accept peace with Israel as long as Israel occupied the Sinai, so by the the time the "three no's" were issued it didn't carry much diplomatic meaning</s>. (The facts are mentioned in the article. Please refrain from introducing biased emphases in the article).

Revision as of 08:03, 30 March 2010

  • Point to the "coincidence" of the attack and Soviet intervention with the apex of the Watergate crisis (this is mention briefly). Not sure this is of great importance in this article.
  • Overall the article is NOT objective & is extremely biased towards Israel. It lacks many key facts that did strongly shake the Israeli (US Adopted) military superiority, especially during the first week of the war. The Israeli / US surprise is mentioned several times.
  • The Sinai war is discussed extensively while the Golan front is mentioned only briefly. Need to elaborate on the latter.
  • (Try to find reliable sources that detail the war specifically on the Golan Heights from the Syrian and/or Iraqi retrospective) - This may be difficult to accomplish given the open nature of Israeli society which tolerates internal discussion and criticism as opposed to the regimes in Syria / Iraq which do not.
  • consider ways of including other perspectives besides Israeli (ie, instead of addressing Arab countries and their actions as they affected Israel) The Arab state's perspective is already discussed in detail.
  • In the lead, Summarize the phases of the war for each front.
  • Point to peace initiatives from Sadat in 1971 and in February 1973 - They both where rejected by Golda Meir government leaving no choice to the Egyptians to get in the war.
  • It isn't emphasized that by the time the Khartoum Arab summit issued the "three no's" Israel had already refused the peace iniativies that required it to leave the Sinai and the Golan Heights. Maybe someone could just add "After Egypt and Syria realized they could not regain their territories diplomatically" before the sentence that starts "the Khartoum Arab Summit issued..." instead of "However." The "three no's" were mostly meaningless pandering to Arab populations. Egypt was not going to accept peace with Israel as long as Israel occupied the Sinai, so by the the time the "three no's" were issued it didn't carry much diplomatic meaning. (The facts are mentioned in the article. Please refrain from introducing biased emphases in the article).
  • There is no mentioned of NATO's active weapons being used to the replenish Israeli loses from the outset of the war.