| Revision as of 06:47, 17 January 2006 editAidan Work (talk | contribs)965 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:47, 17 January 2006 edit undoAidan Work (talk | contribs)965 edits →You're []-bound!Next edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| ==You're ]-bound!== | ==You're ]-bound!== | ||
| Adam, as seen as you've admitted to being a pro-], you are going to end up buring up in the Lake of Fire in ]! - (] 06:47, 17 January 2006 (UTC)) | Adam, as seen as you've admitted to being a pro-], you are going to end up buring up in the Lake of Fire in ]! - (] 06:47, 17 January 2006 (UTC)) | ||
Revision as of 06:47, 17 January 2006
Please note I am not an Administrator and don't wish to be one.
Please note that during January I am travelling - I am currently in Laos. While I am keeping an eye on my watchlist, I cannot respond to requests for information or invitations to help edit articles or take part in disputes. Adam 03:11, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Khmer Rouge
Arbitration has been requested. Do you care to add a statement? WP:RFAR I know you don't have much faith in our dispute resolution process, but I can't see Ruy Lopez getting off, much less an arbitration ruling in favor of him, given his conduct. I also know you don't care one way or another on the current dispute (over the 170 Cambodian coup), but I assure you, the same old Stalinist tactics are being used by Ruy Lopez to push his POV. (However, very recently he has "rewritten" the introduction to exclude the fact that the KR are primarily known for 1.7 million deaths.) CJK 19:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Please? You have fought the LaRouches quite well. Can it not be the same for the communists who are denigrating the 1.7 million people murdered by Pol Pot? CJK 00:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
User:Le baron
Can you explain what you find wrong with the edits made by User:Le baron? User:Zoe| 04:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
I agree that your solution is the best. Personally, I'm in no mood to chase down all the sundry postnominals, but I have a sneaking suspicion others are willing to put in that effort. Slac speak up! 07:53, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Adam, I can add optional parameters to the Infobox Prime Minister for styles and honours if you'd like. However, I'm not overly confident that those who persistently add them to articles would cease doing so unless this move was accompanied by policy or guideline.--cj | talk 14:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
West Virginia (U.S. state) Candidate for US Collaboration of the Week
Dearest Adam Carr, I've added West Virginia's main article to the list of candidates for US Collaboration of the Week. I realize you're a strapping Australian bloke, but the state of West Virginia needs you, yes you. It's in much need of reorganization and lacks a lot of information. I was hoping that with some extra exposure and some wiki teamwork we can get the article up to par with other U.S. state articles. Please voice your comments and vote at the US Collaboration page. I'll say an extra prayer for Dannii Minogue's new album's success. --Caponer 19:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1983 election on Psephos
I mentioned this a while ago, but it'd be nice if you could add the 1983 Tasmanian Senate results to Psephos. Both links are broken and don't seem to be there at all. It's a rather big hole, and it'd save me having to go to the National Library and dig out the results. Ambi 00:50, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Eric Ripper
Adam, I'm doing a bad job of pretending I understand political conventions over at Talk:Premier of Western Australia. Can you go over there and support or ridicule my comments, please?Drew (Snottygobble) | Talk 04:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
You're Hell-bound!
Adam, as seen as you've admitted to being a pro-faggot, you are going to end up buring up in the Lake of Fire in Hell! - (Aidan Work 06:47, 17 January 2006 (UTC))