| Revision as of 21:07, 10 April 2010 view sourceNug (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,427 edits Darn, why isn't my archiver working← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:01, 10 April 2010 view source Amorymeltzer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Oversighters, Administrators63,404 edits →Response to email: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| |archive = User talk:Martintg/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Martintg/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Response to email == | |||
| In reference to your question, I can see your point. However, anyone can provide evidence, not just the parties; you are welcome to provide some yourself if you feel strongly about it. More importantly, however, the evidence section is exactly that - a place for providing evidence. It is decidedly not the place for making arguments, despite what everyone attempts. Nobody actually needs 1000 words +diffs to provide evidence, there's only ever so much of it. For that reason, if a number of editors are trying to make the same argument, they will all be using the same evidence. Extended arguments aren't helpful, especially in a case like this - the arbs have heard it all already, and just want to see new evidence of new disruption. ~ <font color="#FF0099">Amory</font><font color="#555555"><small> ''(] • ] • ])''</small></font> 23:01, 10 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:01, 10 April 2010
"Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe." Ayn RandResponse to email
In reference to your question, I can see your point. However, anyone can provide evidence, not just the parties; you are welcome to provide some yourself if you feel strongly about it. More importantly, however, the evidence section is exactly that - a place for providing evidence. It is decidedly not the place for making arguments, despite what everyone attempts. Nobody actually needs 1000 words +diffs to provide evidence, there's only ever so much of it. For that reason, if a number of editors are trying to make the same argument, they will all be using the same evidence. Extended arguments aren't helpful, especially in a case like this - the arbs have heard it all already, and just want to see new evidence of new disruption. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 23:01, 10 April 2010 (UTC)