Misplaced Pages

Talk:Edwin Black/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Edwin Black Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:10, 12 April 2010 editFred the Oyster (talk | contribs)4,929 edits →Stubifying: No-one has changed or added words to your comments← Previous edit Revision as of 06:04, 13 April 2010 edit undoMercurywoodrose (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers96,097 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 36: Line 36:
I would ask no one to add text in my name or colour my words as was just done and please remove them or sign them yourself. ] (]) 23:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC) I would ask no one to add text in my name or colour my words as was just done and please remove them or sign them yourself. ] (]) 23:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
:No-one has changed or added words to your comments. --] (]) 23:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC) :No-one has changed or added words to your comments. --] (]) 23:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
::While the article he wrote is obviously fascinating and will be controversial within WP, i think we will have to apply extremely exacting standards of notability to the article being listed here. i am not the best person to decide this, but i think so far the article has not gotten significant coverage to qualify to be listed. we will need to show pure NPOV in reporting on the article he wrote. this is necessary regardless of how true/untrue, fair/unfair the article he wrote "actually" is, and regardless of how many wikipedians read it and comment on it (or want to but restrain themselves from forumizing this article).] (]) 06:04, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:04, 13 April 2010

WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
NAThis page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
WikiProject iconJournalism NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
NAThis page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Edwin Black/Archive 2 page.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL


Stubifying

Folks, this article is entirely devoid of references and has generated a complaint to OTRS. As a result, I've stripped out most of the content and it should be rebuilt from the bottom up. Stifle (talk) 10:35, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Needless to say, any additions should be strongly cited to reliable sources. Please consider contacting me if you are considering adding negative material, as it may be worthwhile positioning it with the complainant first. Stifle (talk) 13:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


I believe Edwin Black's syndicated article regarding Misplaced Pages and these recent exchanges will be of interest. Five versions are shown. I am posting this message to the 4 pages which I believe have an interest in the articles.

Edwin Black: see it Edwin Black: this might be better formatted Edwin Black: I believe Edwin Black's syndicated article regarding Misplaced Pages and these recent exchanges will be of interest. Five versions are shown. I am posting this message to the 4 pages which I believe have an interest in the articles.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Saxstudio (talk • contribs)


I would ask no one to add text in my name or colour my words as was just done and please remove them or sign them yourself. Saxstudio (talk) 23:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

No-one has changed or added words to your comments. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 23:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
While the article he wrote is obviously fascinating and will be controversial within WP, i think we will have to apply extremely exacting standards of notability to the article being listed here. i am not the best person to decide this, but i think so far the article has not gotten significant coverage to qualify to be listed. we will need to show pure NPOV in reporting on the article he wrote. this is necessary regardless of how true/untrue, fair/unfair the article he wrote "actually" is, and regardless of how many wikipedians read it and comment on it (or want to but restrain themselves from forumizing this article).Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:04, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Categories: