Misplaced Pages

User:Eric Corbett: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:47, 13 April 2010 view sourceMalleus Fatuorum (talk | contribs)145,401 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 18:37, 17 April 2010 view source Nunez99 (talk | contribs)173 edits final updateNext edit →
Line 65: Line 65:
In November 2007 I accepted a nomination for administrator, perhaps the biggest mistake I've made on Misplaced Pages to date. That process coloured my view of the project, and I found its vindictiveness to be quite shocking. As a result I withdrew from it, and almost the entire project. Against my better judgement I was persuaded to once again undergo the ritual humiliation that RfA has become in May 2008. That is not an experience that I would care to repeat, and I would encourage other editors to think carefully before submitting to their own RfA. In November 2007 I accepted a nomination for administrator, perhaps the biggest mistake I've made on Misplaced Pages to date. That process coloured my view of the project, and I found its vindictiveness to be quite shocking. As a result I withdrew from it, and almost the entire project. Against my better judgement I was persuaded to once again undergo the ritual humiliation that RfA has become in May 2008. That is not an experience that I would care to repeat, and I would encourage other editors to think carefully before submitting to their own RfA.


In June 2008 I had a slight username change, from Malleus Fatuarum to Malleus Fatuorum. In June 2008 I had a slight username change, from Malleus Fatuarum to Malleus Fatuorum. On 17 April 2010, I decided I'd had enough of the abusive way this project is "managed" by out of control nutters, and left.
| style="vertical-align: top;" | | style="vertical-align: top;" |
{{boxboxtop| }} {{boxboxtop| }}

Revision as of 18:37, 17 April 2010

edit count | edit summary usage

Page based on a design by Phaedriel.

Hello
   

This editor is a Veteran Editor III, and is entitled to display this Service Badge.


Adler's Laws of Misplaced Pages:

  1. Misplaced Pages values all contributors equally (especially those with special needs such as a complete lack of judgement or writing abilities).
  2. Elitism is against the core principles of Misplaced Pages, the encyclopedia that anyone can edit; consequently those who abuse their abilities by writing substantially more than their fair share of featured articles must be made to understand that they are suffered, not supported, by the community.
  3. Anyone who uses humour in Misplaced Pages (and especially in project space) exhibits a severe lack of respect for those of their fellow editors who have no sense for it.
  4. Prolific writing of content that cannot be improved is a dangerous, systemic, problem because it will eventually lead to the death of this project. We are here to build an encyclopedia, not to finish it.
    — Statement by User:Hans Adler from one of Giano's many Arbitration Committee hearings.



About me
   

I made my first edit to Misplaced Pages on 6 June 2006, a minor copy edit to the Delian League, but I didn't begin to contribute regularly until February 2007. One of the first articles I contributed significantly to was Sale, Greater Manchester, which achieved GA probably despite my efforts. I learnt a good deal about what was expected of a GA/FA in the process though. At about the same time I expanded the stub on Sale Water Park to what I thought was a pretty cool article. I look back on it now with some nostalgia, and tidying it up is on my list of things to do. I still get just as much pleasure from writing about small subjects like the Manchester Mummy as I do from writing about the more obviously important ones like the Peterloo Massacre.

My personal baptism of fire with the GA/FA review processes came with Stretford, now a featured article. The road to FA was tough, but a fantastic learning experience, in all sorts of ways. When Chat Moss was promoted to FA on New Year's Eve 2007, I felt that maybe I was beginning to understand what was expected of a Misplaced Pages article. Since then I've helped to get Middlewich, Beeston Castle, Chester Cathedral and Ordsall Hall to GA, and the Pendle witch trials to FA. One of the things I've most enjoyed was being part of the Greater Manchester Project team that took the Peterloo Massacre from start to FA in just three weeks, a fantastic collaborative achievement.

As well as those articles to which I've contributed content, I also try to help with copyediting, particularly during the GA/FA review processes, where an objection to the quality of prose can be the difference between a pass and a fail. I flatter myself that I've been able to help at least Walter de Coventre, one of the 2,000th featured articles, Navenby, Shaw and Crompton, and History of timekeeping devices to FA in that way.

In November 2007 I accepted a nomination for administrator, perhaps the biggest mistake I've made on Misplaced Pages to date. That process coloured my view of the project, and I found its vindictiveness to be quite shocking. As a result I withdrew from it, and almost the entire project. Against my better judgement I was persuaded to once again undergo the ritual humiliation that RfA has become in May 2008. That is not an experience that I would care to repeat, and I would encourage other editors to think carefully before submitting to their own RfA.

In June 2008 I had a slight username change, from Malleus Fatuarum to Malleus Fatuorum. On 17 April 2010, I decided I'd had enough of the abusive way this project is "managed" by out of control nutters, and left.

Some userboxes
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
BScThis user has a Bachelor of Science degree.
This user is from Greater Manchester.
MAGAZINEThis user has had his work published in a magazine.
According to The Political Compass this user is:
Economic Left (−4.38) and
Social Libertarian (−4.26)
Wikiprojects
This user participates in
WikiProject
Greater Manchester
.
This user is a member of the GA Project quality task force.
Significant contributions
Featured articles, good articles, and DYKs I have contributed significantly to:
Chat Moss
Donner Party
Gilbert Foliot
Greater Manchester
Gropecunt Lane
Gunpowder Plot
Manchester
Manchester Mummy
Moors murders
Pendle witches
Peterloo Massacre
Samuel Johnson
SSEM
Sale, Greater Manchester
Samlesbury witches
Stretford
The Green Child
Towns in Trafford
Wife selling
Wilfrid
1996 Manchester bombing
Beeston Castle
Chester Cathedral
Didsbury
Ferret legging
Manchester Liners
Manchester Mark 1
Manchester Martyrs
Ordsall Hall
Salford
The Princess and the Pea
Tickle Cock Bridge
Trafford Park
Did you knowCharles White (physician)
Did you knowDonner Party
Did you knowElegy Written in a Country Churchyard
Did you knowFerret legging
Did you knowManchester computers
Did you knowPeterloo Massacre
Did you knowPort of Manchester
Did you knowTickle Cock Bridge
Did you knowWife selling
Links & tools

WikiSpeakGA SweepsGAN statisticsFeatured article statsPage indexArticle historyArticle trafficImage moverDead link checker
Freedom of panorama rulesMisplaced Pages statisticsActive administratorsActive usersAfDs startedReadability toolWikiCheckerdablinksStalker scriptRfA statswikidashboardRfX reportLink suggestion toolword searchHow many are watching this page?Article wizardNew PagesSilly wikilinks

Work in progress
Other
fr-1Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français.


GA reviews
   

I believe that the good article process is potentially one of the best initiatives in Misplaced Pages – a lightweight, although to some controversial, process that generates a significant improvement in article quality. So I decided it was only fair to try and help out by taking on some of the reviews. This is a list of the GA nominations I've reviewed:

The icon represents the outcome of the review, not necessarily the present status of the article.

I also helped out at the GA Sweeps project. The list of articles I checked is available here, along with the results of the reviews.


Categories:
User:Eric Corbett: Difference between revisions Add topic