| Revision as of 21:45, 28 April 2010 editThe Rambling Man (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors286,429 edits →Other issues: read it← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:54, 28 April 2010 edit undoWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,122 edits →Other issues: How to save space in an encyclopediaNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :One step at a time. I have neither the time, patience, or skill to investigate every Misplaced Pages criterion, policy, or page. We're told ] assures the accuracy of featured lists, I'd like to see how that works because I have seen at least one case where it didn't and it's unlikely that is the only one. --] (]) 21:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | :One step at a time. I have neither the time, patience, or skill to investigate every Misplaced Pages criterion, policy, or page. We're told ] assures the accuracy of featured lists, I'd like to see how that works because I have seen at least one case where it didn't and it's unlikely that is the only one. --] (]) 21:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::No it doesn't. Not by any means. Read it again. It opens with "The threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is verifiability, not truth..." If you have an issue with that, then take it up with the policy. It's not list-centric. Good luck. ] (]) | ::No it doesn't. Not by any means. Read it again. It opens with "The threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is verifiability, not truth..." If you have an issue with that, then take it up with the policy. It's not list-centric. Good luck. ] (]) | ||
| :::Thank you. Facts were just cluttering up the place, anyway. --] (]) 21:54, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:54, 28 April 2010
Blanked the page
Other issues
Misplaced Pages:Featured article criteria also does not include "accuracy" as a criterion. And these articles appear on the main page daily. I would suggest that your concerns would be better addressed globally than just at lists.... The Rambling Man (talk) 21:27, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- One step at a time. I have neither the time, patience, or skill to investigate every Misplaced Pages criterion, policy, or page. We're told W:V assures the accuracy of featured lists, I'd like to see how that works because I have seen at least one case where it didn't and it's unlikely that is the only one. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- No it doesn't. Not by any means. Read it again. It opens with "The threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is verifiability, not truth..." If you have an issue with that, then take it up with the policy. It's not list-centric. Good luck. The Rambling Man (talk)
- Thank you. Facts were just cluttering up the place, anyway. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:54, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- No it doesn't. Not by any means. Read it again. It opens with "The threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is verifiability, not truth..." If you have an issue with that, then take it up with the policy. It's not list-centric. Good luck. The Rambling Man (talk)