Misplaced Pages

Talk:Cornwallis in Ireland: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:58, 26 April 2010 editMagicpiano (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers112,383 edits Catholic and Protestant Camps: what i thought← Previous edit Revision as of 20:57, 29 April 2010 edit undo86.40.210.11 (talk) Catholic and Protestant CampsNext edit →
Line 44: Line 44:


::::That's exactly what I figured. I have no specific reason to either accept or dispute the editor's claim, but I'm also cognizant of the limitations of the source he's arguing against. '']''] 16:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC) ::::That's exactly what I figured. I have no specific reason to either accept or dispute the editor's claim, but I'm also cognizant of the limitations of the source he's arguing against. '']''] 16:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

:Oh this guy just takes the biscuit. He clearly doesn't understand what he's talking about, he refuses to respond to my comments, yet demands 'civility', whilst simultaneously treating me as little better than a dog. If I thought he even resembled a gentleman, I'd challenge him to a duel for the gross calumnities he's presented against me. He's impervious to reason. I am seriously pissed off at this stage. Such cheek. ] (]) 20:57, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:57, 29 April 2010

Good articleCornwallis in Ireland has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 7, 2010Good article nomineeListed
WikiProject iconBiography: Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconMilitary history: British / European GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
British military history task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
WikiProject iconIreland GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
A fact from Cornwallis in Ireland appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 March 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Misplaced Pages:Recent additions/2010/March.
Misplaced Pages

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cornwallis in Ireland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lampman (talk) 02:59, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article. Before I start on the main review, I have a question about the sources. There seems to be a heavy reliance on certain 19th-century sources - primarily Lecky and Maxwell - which must be assumed to be outdated. I am no expert on the period, however, so could you please justify this decision to me? Lampman (talk) 02:59, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The primary source I used is Wickwire, the only significant 20th century bio of Cornwallis I am aware of (which if you count the duplicated references accounts for most of the citations). I needed other sources to address what I perceived to be a fairly sympathetic attitude adopted by the Wickwires, and to provide background and color the Wickwires did not. Unfortunately most of my area libraries do not have great coverage of this era, which is why I turned to the older sources. (I understand the risks and limitations of using older sources, since those that apply to 18th-century North America, my normal area of work, are rife with issues.)
I suppose this is acceptable, since the older sources are used sparingly and Wickwire is the main source. If you plan to take the article to FA, you'll probably have to address this though. Lampman (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
I actually have leads on modern histories that should provide some additional color on this episode, which will eventually make it into the article when I take the time to follow them up. Magic♪piano 13:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
I'll address the issues described below in due course; thanks for your detailed feedback. Magic♪piano 12:20, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Here's the rest of the review. I've done some copyediting, but please ensure that I haven't distorted the meaning. There are some, mostly minor, issues with the language. Some of the sentences are too long and hard to read. There are also some issues of style I'd like to address.

Lead:

  • The lead is not sufficiently long to summarise an article of this size; it should go into more detail and be at least two paragraphs (see Misplaced Pages:Lead#Length).
  • The image is far too big. While it is permissible to force the size of an image, especially for the lead image, Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style#Images recommends 1.35 maximum. Is there any reason that the other upright images are forced?
  • "due in part to" what, his resignation or the fall or the government, or both?
    • I reworked the lead and resized the image. At the default image size settings, the lead image is now under 300px. The more vertically oriented images I tend to size up a little, and this article has a bunch of them. Magic♪piano 00:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I'm still not happy with the image sizes. It is customary to let images default in size, and to let logged in users decide themselves what size they want the images to be displayed at. The lead image can be sized up a bit, but not this much. It looks enormous, particularly for readers with small screens. I tried it at 1.35, that should be plenty. As for the other pictures, it is permissible to size up images with specific details (maps, charts etc.), but these are just portraits, and I see no compelling reason to force their size. Lampman (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
  • My standard rejoinder on this is: if you as reviewer don't like the image arrangement, feel free to move/resize them. I get feedback from reviewers on images that is contradictory in the aggregate (images are too small to see, or too large; should be on left, no, right; and so on), so do what pleases you. I don't have your settings, screen geometry, and taste filter. (I personally don't find a 250px image to be overly large.) Magic♪piano 13:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
  • This is not about personal taste; this is about my responsibility as a reviewer to make sure the article complies with Misplaced Pages's manual of style for layout, per criterion 1a. I have clearly stated what guideline this article violates, but you have so far not given any reason why you believe that guideline should be ignored. It is not my responsibility as a reviewer to fix problems with the article, simply to point out where the article fails to meed the criteria, and then fail or pass it depending on whether those issues are addressed. Lampman (talk) 04:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Sigh. I don't know when the change in thumbnail default sizes occurred, but this whole discussion is probably a good example of why not to use relative sizing in the lead image. I never recall changing my thumbnail size, but it was set at 120, rather than the current 220. I will adjust. Magic♪piano 13:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Background:

  • "When the French Revolution broke out in the early 1790s, Catholics and middle-class Protestants united to form the Society of United Irishmen, which successfully extracted additional rights, although there was some Protestant resistance to the idea of full Catholic suffrage, due to their overwhelming numerical majority." - too long, split up
  • "By mid-May 1798, British troops and the Irish Volunteers, directed by the current Commander-in-Chief, General Gerard Lake, had acted with brutality and caprice to put down elements of growing rebellion; these actions fanned the flames of rebellion" - too choppy, there are six clauses here, please rewrite.

Rebellion:

  • Portland - you should probably wikilink this, the last reference to this man was too far back.
  • "speciously" - this word seems a bit POV.
  • If it is indeed obvious, then it needs not be pointed out. If it's not obvious, then it's POV to state it. If you have a source calling it "speciously", then you can of course quote him on that. Lampman (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
  • The Wickwires do in fact use the word: "He reasoned speciously: that Ireland already had one university ...". Would you like me to rewrite this so that is explicitly presented as their opinion? Magic♪piano 19:44, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Departure:

  • These last three sections are very short, which is not recommended per Misplaced Pages:Layout#Body sections. Is there any way they could be combined into one, under a heading like "Resignation and aftermath" or similar? Maybe also move the image of George III up so he won't interfere with the notes.
  • "Catholic rights, and gave signs" who is the subject here? It can't be "Cabinet and royal support". Did he give these signs?

Emancipation:

Let me know if there are any more issues. Magic♪piano 00:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your work so far, the rest of issues seem to have been addresses satisfactorily now. Lampman (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
I think that takes care of things (now that I have my settings at the current defaults...) Magic♪piano 13:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, except not all the thumbnails were set to "upright". I suppose that was a mistake, I changed it. I'll go ahead and list it as a GA now, good work! Lampman (talk) 15:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Ooops. Thanks! Magic♪piano 15:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Catholic and Protestant Camps

Lecky is a fine historian but his studies are 120 years old. Therefore the charge that the United Irishmen split into Catholic and Protestant camps simply doesn't reflect what happened. There was a very real division between moderates and radicals though, but Catholics were interspersed between these (McCormick and Thomas Addis Emmett, for example, were moderates) In short Lecky was wrong. Read Bartlett, Dunne and even Pakenham (1969) to get the modern scholarly response. 86.40.207.97 (talk) 20:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm actually aware that there are shortcomings in the scholarship on this article, and will revisit much of what the older sources say the next time I pick this article up to work on. Please provide titles, ISBNs, or other more detailed catalog information for the works you suggest; I am not widely read in Irish history. Magic♪piano 21:21, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Did you write the article? For someone not widely read in Irish history you've done a fine job. Lecky is a good historian but he is quite dated, and was also rather critical of the manner in which the Act of Union was passed (Despite being a Liberal Unionist)
Here are a few suggestions; Thomas Bartlett, The Fall and Rise of the Irish Nation (It has a good chapter on the 1798-1801 period), Thomas Pakenham, The Year of Liberty, rather old (1969) but the authoritative history of the rebellion, Patrick Geoghegan, The Irish Act of Union, a study in high politics (Authoritative account of the Act of Union, Cornwallis in Ireland, and the resignation of William Pitt) Also a collection of essays, The Act of Union, Bicentenary perspectives. Happy hunting. 86.40.207.97 (talk) 17:39, 22 April 2010 (UTC) P.S- G.C. Bolton wrote a book on the Act of Union also, worth a look.
I did indeed do most of the work on this. I'm working on improving Misplaced Pages's coverage of Cornwallis, which this article is a dent in. Thanks for your source recommendations. Magic♪piano 00:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Just for explanation: I reversed the deletions of the anonymous IP talk because the deletions were unsourced and unexplained. There was no indication to me at the time that any explanation was provided, other than the tag "references removed". I disagree with the removal of this reference, but am not going to get into an edit war on this matter. Hohenloh 15:29, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
That's exactly what I figured. I have no specific reason to either accept or dispute the editor's claim, but I'm also cognizant of the limitations of the source he's arguing against. Magic♪piano 16:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Oh this guy just takes the biscuit. He clearly doesn't understand what he's talking about, he refuses to respond to my comments, yet demands 'civility', whilst simultaneously treating me as little better than a dog. If I thought he even resembled a gentleman, I'd challenge him to a duel for the gross calumnities he's presented against me. He's impervious to reason. I am seriously pissed off at this stage. Such cheek. 86.40.210.11 (talk) 20:57, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Categories: