| Revision as of 04:20, 1 May 2010 editNiteshift36 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers41,775 edits →Ehren Watada← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:02, 1 May 2010 edit undoNovaseminary (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,467 edits deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *'''Keep'''- ] is about people who otherwise lead private lives. Generally speaking, people who do half hour interviews on a nationally syndicated radio show aren't trying to maintain private lives. Also, a quick NPR search shows the story "What Does Watada Case Mean for Military Law?", indicating that there is more to just this story than just a "refusal to deploy".] (]) 03:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''- ] is about people who otherwise lead private lives. Generally speaking, people who do half hour interviews on a nationally syndicated radio show aren't trying to maintain private lives. Also, a quick NPR search shows the story "What Does Watada Case Mean for Military Law?", indicating that there is more to just this story than just a "refusal to deploy".] (]) 03:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::*His interviews have been about....yeah, his one event. What effect his case may or may not have on military law really isn't relevent. The case itself may (or may not) be notable, that doesn't make him notable. His sole claim to notability is all connected to one event, his refusal to deploy. ] (]) 04:20, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | ::*His interviews have been about....yeah, his one event. What effect his case may or may not have on military law really isn't relevent. The case itself may (or may not) be notable, that doesn't make him notable. His sole claim to notability is all connected to one event, his refusal to deploy. ] (]) 04:20, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Per nom, this article fails ] / ] (if a long, drawn out one). Even if it strengthens the case for ] if the person remains low profile, not doing does not necessarily make one notable for anything other than that the one event. Per ], this deserves to be and is already mentioned in ], but shouldn’t get its own article. ] (]) 06:02, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:02, 1 May 2010
Ehren Watada
AfDs for this article:- Ehren Watada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was nominated 4 years ago and closed with no consensus. This is WP:BLP1E. Watada was completely non-notable before being charged with the crimes and has done nothing notable since his trial ended. His case was covered by numerous sources, but everything comes back to a single event. I do not view trials, appeals etc as seperate events. They are all part of one event, his refusal to deploy.Niteshift36 (talk) 23:23, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep- BLP1E is about people who otherwise lead private lives. Generally speaking, people who do half hour interviews on a nationally syndicated radio show aren't trying to maintain private lives. Also, a quick NPR search shows the story "What Does Watada Case Mean for Military Law?", indicating that there is more to just this story than just a "refusal to deploy".Umbralcorax (talk) 03:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- His interviews have been about....yeah, his one event. What effect his case may or may not have on military law really isn't relevent. The case itself may (or may not) be notable, that doesn't make him notable. His sole claim to notability is all connected to one event, his refusal to deploy. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:20, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom, this article fails WP:ONEEVENT / WP:BLP1E (if a long, drawn out one). Even if it strengthens the case for WP:BLP1E if the person remains low profile, not doing does not necessarily make one notable for anything other than that the one event. Per WP:ONEEVENT, this deserves to be and is already mentioned in Opposition to the Iraq War, but shouldn’t get its own article. Novaseminary (talk) 06:02, 1 May 2010 (UTC)