Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:06, 17 May 2010 editStephan Schulz (talk | contribs)Administrators26,888 edits →Suspected sockpuppets: Another← Previous edit Revision as of 22:08, 17 May 2010 edit undoStephan Schulz (talk | contribs)Administrators26,888 edits →Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz: NextNext edit →
Line 41: Line 41:
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##--> <!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##-->
Another one. --] (]) 05:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC) Another one. --] (]) 05:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
:...and one more. Is somebody going to take this on before it is the size of ]?


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>======

Revision as of 22:08, 17 May 2010

Scibaby

Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.

Report date April 25 2010, 15:12 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Prolog

The usual. Prolog (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by ChrisO

I just added User:Stympkin. The editing pattern of this one is odd. It looks Scibaby-like in parts but has some anomalous elements which don't fit the usual Scibaby pattern; however, clearly not a new editor, so perhaps a sockpuppet of someone else? Or maybe Scibaby is changing his pattern? -- ChrisO (talk) 23:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

On the other hand, User:ISandert is clearly Scibaby. -- ChrisO (talk) 01:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz

Another one. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 05:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

...and one more. Is somebody going to take this on before it is the size of Mount Ararat?
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

All First four blocked and tagged, but a sleeper check would still be appreciated. Thanks, - 2/0 (cont.) 16:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Blocked ISandert as well. Stympkin looks likely, but I am not sure enough to WP:DUCK it right now. - 2/0 (cont.) 04:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Blocked Stympkin and a new one; Virnbaum. Prolog (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Blocked Sma888. - 2/0 (cont.) 07:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Added and blocked Hughiefd; this one might be User:ChildofMidnight (or possibly User:Grundle2600) instead of Scibaby, but they are definitely a sock. - 2/0 (cont.) 07:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

All accounts through FirstLast33 are blocked and tagged. - 2/0 (cont.) 05:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Added AlfredGeorgeWoolsie - possibly not SciBaby, but certainly one of the many sock puppeteers active in the area. Hipocrite (talk) 01:31, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention.    Requested by Prolog (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

 Clerk endorsed The usual, confirmation, sleeper check, etc. Elockid 15:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Categories: