Misplaced Pages

Talk:Death of Jeremiah Duggan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:53, 23 May 2010 editAlbert Sumlin (talk | contribs)93 edits Unbalanced← Previous edit Revision as of 03:15, 24 May 2010 edit undoMiszaBot I (talk | contribs)234,552 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 30d) to Talk:Death of Jeremiah Duggan/Archive 3.Next edit →
Line 37: Line 37:


__TOC__ __TOC__

== Main sources ==

Parking the most detailed secondary sources here for future reference, in the order they appeared:

*Kirby, Terry (2003). , ''The Independent'', 28 August 2003.
*Midgley, Carol (2003). , ''The Times'', 7 November 2003.
*Samuels, Tim (2004). , BBC ''Newsnight'', 12 February 2004.
*Smith, David James (2004). , ''The Sunday Times'', 18 July 2004.
*Kirby, Terry (2004). , ''The Independent'', 21 July 2004.
*Witt, April (2004). , ''The Washington Post'', 24 October 2004.
*Townsend, Mark (2004). , ''The Observer'', 31 October 2004.
*Townsend, Mark (2006). , ''The Guardian'', 17 September 2006.
*Townsend, Mark and Doward, Jamie (2007). , ''The Observer'', 25 March 2007.
*Nugent, Helen (2007). , ''The Times'', 28 March 2007.
*Nordhausen, Frank (2007). , ''Berliner Zeitung'', 4 April 2007.
*Degen, Wolfgang (2007). , ''Wiesbadener Kurier'', 19 April 2007.

<font color="purple">]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">]</font> <font color="green">]</font></sup></small> 22:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


:Here's a recent article, though I don't know if it has any new info.
:*Taylor, Jerome (2010). ''The Independent '' 27 February 2010
:There are also a few offline sources of comparable quality. &nbsp; <b>]&nbsp; ]&nbsp; </b> 19:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

::Thanks for the Independent article, which I hadn't seen. <font color="purple">]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">]</font> <font color="green">]</font></sup></small> 05:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

==Cite error==
There is a cite error " Cite error: Invalid &lt;ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Degen; see ]." Anomiebot will dig the ref from history if it is there, once the nobots is removed. '']&nbsp;]'', 12:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC).
:OK found it (re)added and restored. '']&nbsp;]'', 12:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC).


== Unbalanced == == Unbalanced ==

Revision as of 03:15, 24 May 2010

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Death of Jeremiah Duggan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days 

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 20, 2006Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
October 6, 2009Articles for deletionKept
March 25, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconLaw Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconDeath
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
This page has been cited as a source by a notable professional or academic publication:
Baroness Sarah Ludford, Member of the European Parliament: "MEP urges investigation of Jeremiah Duggan's death"
Mediation, arbitration,
requests for clarification, and
other discussions about the
LaRouche movement, 2004-2008
Long term abuse subpage, LaRouche accounts
ArbCom clarification/enforcement,
AN/I, 2005-8
Arbitration 2006
Arbitration 2005
Arbitration 2004
Mediation 2006 and 2007
Mediation 2004
Article talk 2004-2007
Template talk
Categories
This box:

Unbalanced

This article is written from the point of view of the British judicial authorities, who are only commentators in this case. The point of view of the German authorities, who actually have legal standing, is buried at the end of the article. It seemed to me that the obvious solution was to give equal billing to the public statements of the Germans. However, Slimvirgin, who judging from the history seems to have written this article almost single-handedly, reversed my edit, so I have added the unbalanced warning. If the article were titled "British campaign on Death of Jeremiah Duggan," the present layout might be appropriate, but if it is billed as a factual article explaining his death, the German viewpoint ought not to be suppressed. Albert Sumlin (talk) 11:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Slimvirgin, what you put in the "edit summary" box was "that makes the lead too long." I'd like to point out that you had other options; if the length of the lead is a problem, you could reduce both points of view proportionately, instead of reducing only that of the German authorities. Also, much of what you reversed was not in the lead at all, it was in the middle of the article, but you still moved it back to the end. Albert Sumlin (talk) 11:53, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Categories: