| Revision as of 13:13, 23 May 2010 editDront (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users576 edits Edit on Föreningen Vetenskap och Folkbildning← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:05, 25 May 2010 edit undoThebee (talk | contribs)1,956 edits →Edit on Föreningen Vetenskap och FolkbildningNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| == Edit on ] == | == Edit on ] == | ||
| Would you care to discuss your ? Why do you feel that he should be removed from the list of members? --: ] (]) 13:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC) | Would you care to discuss your ? Why do you feel that he should be removed from the list of members? --: ] (]) 13:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :Sorry about that, my mistake! :-( I misread the text as stating that he was on the board of VoF. The revert of my mistaken edit is completely correct. Thanks to Mrund for reverting it! | |||
| :] (]) 09:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Hansson citation == | == Hansson citation == | ||
Revision as of 09:05, 25 May 2010
Archived Talks page, 29 Oct 2006 Archived Talks page 12 Jan 2007
Edit on Föreningen Vetenskap och Folkbildning
Would you care to discuss your edit? Why do you feel that he should be removed from the list of members? --: Dront (talk) 13:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, my mistake! :-( I misread the text as stating that he was on the board of VoF. The revert of my mistaken edit is completely correct. Thanks to Mrund for reverting it!
- Thebee (talk) 09:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Hansson citation
Dear Thebee,
I undid your revision of anthroposophy, your removal of the Hansson citation; and mentioned on the talk page for what reason. If you can find a better one please replace it, but don't remove it until there is an agreement to do so on the talk page. Lkleinjans 11:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Fix Revert
Thanks, I reverted only a part of what I ment to at Waldorf education. --Rocksanddirt 21:55, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- I thought you did, and implemented what you seemed to have intended. Best, Thebee 00:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Quick comment on archive at Waldorf education
You do realize that by hand archiving last weeks discussion you will have given dianaw another reason to think you are trying to hide stuff. Right now we have a bot archive the page after discussions are stale for two weeks. It might be better to leave it be, in the future. --Rocksanddirt 16:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)