Misplaced Pages

Capitalism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:23, 22 March 2002 editPeter Winnberg (talk | contribs)464 editsm -Talk← Previous edit Revision as of 07:32, 22 March 2002 edit undoZundark (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers29,661 edits excise 24.150.61.63 stuffNext edit →
Line 24: Line 24:
* ] argues for collective ownnership of the means of production, and the overthrow of the state. * ] argues for collective ownnership of the means of production, and the overthrow of the state.
* ] argues for collective control of economy without the need for a State. * ] argues for collective control of economy without the need for a State.

A fusion of the two approaches is
* ] which emphasizes the role of private business in seeking energy and material efficiency, and the role of government in making it difficult or expensive to reduce biodiversity or pollute the commons.


=== Arguments for and against capitalism === === Arguments for and against capitalism ===

Revision as of 07:32, 22 March 2002

Capitalism refers to a set of practices that were institutionalized in Europe between the 16th and 19th centuries, especially involving the right of individuals and groups of individuals acting as "legal persons" (or corporations) to buy and sell capital goods (including land and labor) in a free (meaning, free from state control) market; a set of theories meant to justify the private ownership of capital, to explain the operation of such markets, and to guide the application or elimination of government regulation of property and markets; and a set of beliefs about the advantages of such practices.

The meanings of "capitalism"

The word "capitalism" is used for many different meanings, sometimes opposite ones. However, most of them are variants on the definition "economic system in which capital goods belong to private individuals."

As with many common words, and most particularly ideologically laden words, "capitalism" has many meanings, and there is a lot confusion when using it as to whether it means any particular meaning, or whether it is just a slogan or insult used without particular meaning intend (or worse, with confusion intended).

"Capitalism" as a phenomenon (e.g., the system of the private ownership of capital) is certainly different from "capitalism" as an ideology (the philosophical advocacy of that system--not the same kind of notion at all.

Opponents of capitalism sometimes deny that these represent subtantially different things, or say they go hand-in-hand. Although it is arguable whether or not two meanings of the word "capitalism" of the same kind are somehow "equivalent" under someone's subjective notion of equivalence, for the sake of not making a straw man argument when accusing someone else to be a proponent of capitalism, these different concepts must be clearly distinguished.

Capitalism and political ideologies

There are many different and opposite ideologies that value capitalism:

Many different and opposite ideologies fight capitalism and argue for collectivism, which

  • socialism argues for extensive State control of economy, though with small tolerated areas of capitalism.
  • fascism argues for extensive State control of economy, with delegation of its powers to complacent capitalists.
  • communism argues for collective ownnership of the means of production, and the overthrow of the state.
  • libertarian socialism argues for collective control of economy without the need for a State.

Arguments for and against capitalism

Since there are so many divergent ideologies backing or fighting capitalism, there is no possible agreed upon argument list for or against it. See under each of the above ideologies what it has to say about capitalism.

See also