| Revision as of 16:59, 16 June 2010 editUnbroken Chain (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,193 edits Creating new discussion for Samofi. (TW) | Revision as of 17:37, 16 June 2010 edit undoCsabaBabba (talk | contribs)47 edits it is my first accountNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ;Comments by accused parties <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See ].''</span></small> | ;Comments by accused parties <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See ].''</span></small> | ||
| I would like to say that this is my first account. After my first edit I was 2 times investigated - I only wanted to correct mistake and not to make problems. I have reacted just in the talk page - after it I have changed the article. I have used only my personal computer at home, I have used wifi router, I have the Slovak IP starting 85. Only one user has marked me as the sock puppet of Samofi ("bad faith") but after my action because I put him to the http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents | |||
| Its my pleasure to continue and help with the investigation. --] (]) 17:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ;Comments by other users | ;Comments by other users | ||
Revision as of 17:37, 16 June 2010
Samofi
Samofi (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Samofi/Archive.
16 June 2010
- Suspected sockpuppets
- CsabaBabba (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Evidence submitted by Hell In A Bucket (talk)
editing pattern and account creation timing seem to be about right for a checkuser to see if this is a sleeper account. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
I would like to say that this is my first account. After my first edit I was 2 times investigated - I only wanted to correct mistake and not to make problems. I have reacted just in the talk page - after it I have changed the article. I have used only my personal computer at home, I have used wifi router, I have the Slovak IP starting 85. Only one user has marked me as the sock puppet of Samofi ("bad faith") but after my action because I put him to the http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents Its my pleasure to continue and help with the investigation. --CsabaBabba (talk) 17:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comments by other users
- CheckUser requests
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status –
Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Categories: