| Revision as of 17:50, 21 June 2010 view sourceMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 24h) to User talk:Redvers/Archive43.← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:38, 21 June 2010 view source KnowIG (talk | contribs)8,526 edits →Do I look stupid: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| :Do you work for Kadioglu Baharat or have any connection with them? What is your relationship with {{user|Ahmetk}}? <small>]''']''']</small> 09:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC) | :Do you work for Kadioglu Baharat or have any connection with them? What is your relationship with {{user|Ahmetk}}? <small>]''']''']</small> 09:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Do I look stupid == | |||
| Don't sock puppet me to make me look badKnowIG 18:38, 21 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:38, 21 June 2010
 .svg){kind=small} male •  gay •  married •  a socialist •  a vegetarian •  Welsh •  an atheist • and we'll let you know
|
.gif){kind=small}
Sock puppet's edit (apparently)
Hello, Redvers. I was referred here, on my talk page, by Keithbob . The story is this: I see a contribution (see the last comment in this section) to a RfC followed by this:
- "—Preceding unsigned comment added by BifurcatingBellCurves (talk • contribs) 10:21, 8 June 2010 (UTC) (Note: BifurcatingBellCurves is a sock of the same banned user as GypsyBanksters)".
When I click on BifurcatingBellCurves, I see a tag reading:
- "This account is a suspected sock puppet of Karmaisking and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to editing habits, contributions or the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer for evidence. This policy subsection may also be helpful."
I'm not savvy enough to refer as advised, and I'm wondering whether I should revert the contribution in question. Also, from what I've read about violating bans, I wonder whether I should report the violation, and, if so, where. I would prefer to figure all this out from reading, but by the time I found the answer, I'd have forgotten the whole thing! Can you advise me? Thanks for your time and attention. --Everything Else Is Taken (talk) 15:39, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- No need to report it - we blocked them earlier, reverted and deleted where required and are now back on track. If nobody has replied to the sock's entry on the page, then, yes, by all means remove the entry (with an edit summary like "rv addition by sock of a banned user"). Banned users are not allowed to edit Misplaced Pages at all. They are persona non grata, so we should always remove their additions... except if they're truly valuable to us, as there's no point cutting our noses off... ⇦REDVƎRS⇨ 15:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your help. No one had replied to the sock's entry, and I have done as you suggested. --Everything Else Is Taken (talk) 15:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- No need to report it - we blocked them earlier, reverted and deleted where required and are now back on track. If nobody has replied to the sock's entry on the page, then, yes, by all means remove the entry (with an edit summary like "rv addition by sock of a banned user"). Banned users are not allowed to edit Misplaced Pages at all. They are persona non grata, so we should always remove their additions... except if they're truly valuable to us, as there's no point cutting our noses off... ⇦REDVƎRS⇨ 15:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
User: East of Borschov
Make sure this person gets a Barnstar for voestalpine. I'm sure this person's contriburions, though added after some encouragement by me, were more valuable.
I forgot there would also be a reference to stub-class on the talk page. But then you said you didn't call it a stub anyway.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 7 June 2010
- From the team: Changes to the Signpost
- News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more
- Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 14 June 2010
- News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Misplaced Pages project concludes, brief news
- In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Misplaced Pages used in Indian court, Is Misplaced Pages a cult?, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Kadioglu Baharat
Hello Redvers, I was communicating with Favonian on explaining my site. There is no advertising involved in what I wrote. I was explaining why the company is important for the public. There is a huge community behind it and what they do is very important for the future of healthy spices. I would like to discuss this with you. Geronimo ahmo (talk) 09:55, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Do you work for Kadioglu Baharat or have any connection with them? What is your relationship with Ahmetk (talk · contribs)? ⇦REDVƎRS⇨ 09:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Do I look stupid
Don't sock puppet me to make me look badKnowIG 18:38, 21 June 2010 (UTC)