Revision as of 22:06, 22 June 2010 view sourceKnowIG (talk | contribs)8,526 edits →Tone it down: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:11, 22 June 2010 view source TreasuryTag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,645 editsm Bugger off.Next edit → | ||
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 19:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)</div> | <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 19:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)</div> | ||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0053 --> | <!-- EdwardsBot 0053 --> | ||
== Tone it down == | |||
This is a public uncensored website, tone the language down when editing ,there is no place for the use of words such a bollocks KnowIG 22:06, 22 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:11, 22 June 2010
TreasuryTag is currently, or is going to be, away from Misplaced Pages, between April 14 and April 19, 2009, and may not be able to respond immediately to queries. He may, however, edit a little unless he's using the splendid Wikibreak enforcer. |
Just to fix the formatting...
Articles for deletion nomination of Corporatocracy
This article could have been deleted as an expired PROD, but in view of its long history and number of contributors, and the fact that there are corresponding articles on a number of other Wikipedias, I have taken it to AfD to get more opinions. I am notifying you because you have contributed to the article. Your views are welcome at WP:Articles for deletion/Corporatocracy. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Nicholas Briggs in the Pandorica Opens
How is it bollocks that Nicholas Briggs is uncredited as the voice of Daleks in this episode? Watch this episode of Doctor Who Confidential at 4.25 onwards
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00swfv0/Doctor_Who_Confidential_Series_5_Alien_Abduction/ Sepmix (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- It was bollocks because it was unverifiable and not backed up by a reliable source, as Misplaced Pages requires. ╟─TreasuryTag►constablewick─╢ 17:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Can it not be verified by that footage? Sepmix (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- If you would like to add it back into the article with an appropriate citation then that would be fine. ╟─TreasuryTag►Captain-Regent─╢ 17:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Does the Doctor Who Wikia count? Sepmix (talk) 17:45, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- No, self-published sources do not count. ╟─TreasuryTag►You may go away now.─╢ 17:47, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Very well. Sepmix (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 21 June 2010
- Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons
- News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more
- In the news: Misplaced Pages better than Britannica, Pending changes as a victory of tradition, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U2
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News