Misplaced Pages

:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:28, 30 June 2010 editHBC AIV helperbot3 (talk | contribs)140,330 editsm Empty. rm Small Arms Collector (blocked indef by Someguy1221 (ACB)).← Previous edit Revision as of 09:28, 30 June 2010 edit undoEditor182 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,053 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
*{{Userlinks|Kristoferb}} is absolutely relentless and aggressive. They have no intention of ceasing their incessant edit warring. I proposed the removal of two of the users uploaded images on both ] and ]. Even after ] (]), an administrator on the English Misplaced Pages who is currently on break, took the decision that it was indeed in best interest of these articles to have these images removed, this user is still persisting. Furthermore, this user has now turned against my contributions and is questioning the quality of my own user uploaded images, which are months old, and has never been done before, and the user themselves has attempted to remove and replace several of my images when their disputes against my images failed, which I have reinstated. The user cannot be reasoned with due to their bellicose and disputative nature. To negotiate, you need reason, and this person has none. At the very least, the user should have an article ban imposed on the aforementioned articles, one of which is a featured article, though he will undoubtedly continue his vandalism and warring elsewhere. At best, an immediate ban would benefit the community. ] (]) 09:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
<!-- Categories --><noinclude>]]{{/Header}}
{{Floatinglink|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}
__NEWSECTIONLINK__<!-- __NEWSECTIONLINK__ causes a + button to
appear on the edit page. This is a useful feature, as it allows editors
to add reports without edit conflicts; edit conflicts are very common on this page. -->
<!-- The backlog tag is automatically changed to enabled
({{adminbacklog}}) or disabled ({{noadminbacklog}}) by a bot. There is
usually no need to manually edit the following line. Please see the talk page for more details if you wish to manually force the removal of the back-log indicator, rather than removing it. --> </noinclude>
{{noadminbacklog}}<!-- v2.0.15 RemoveBlocked=On MergeDuplicates=On AutoMark=On FixInstructions=On AutoBacklog=On AddLimit=5 RemoveLimit=2 -->

== Alerts ==
{{Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2}}

=== User-reported ===
<!-- The following are examples of how to report a vandal on this page.
Please copy and paste an appropriate example to the very bottom of the page.

Anonymous Users (IP addresses):
* {{IPvandal|IP address}} brief reason for listing (keep it short) ~~~~

Registered Users:
* {{Vandal|username}} optional brief reason for listing (keep it short) ~~~~
* {{Userlinks|username}} optional brief reason for listing (keep it short) ~~~~

List begins BELOW this line -->

Revision as of 09:28, 30 June 2010

  • Kristoferb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is absolutely relentless and aggressive. They have no intention of ceasing their incessant edit warring. I proposed the removal of two of the users uploaded images on both sertraline and paracetamol. Even after NuclearWarfare (talk), an administrator on the English Misplaced Pages who is currently on break, took the decision that it was indeed in best interest of these articles to have these images removed, this user is still persisting. Furthermore, this user has now turned against my contributions and is questioning the quality of my own user uploaded images, which are months old, and has never been done before, and the user themselves has attempted to remove and replace several of my images when their disputes against my images failed, which I have reinstated. The user cannot be reasoned with due to their bellicose and disputative nature. To negotiate, you need reason, and this person has none. At the very least, the user should have an article ban imposed on the aforementioned articles, one of which is a featured article, though he will undoubtedly continue his vandalism and warring elsewhere. At best, an immediate ban would benefit the community. Editor182 (talk) 09:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions Add topic