Misplaced Pages

Germanic peoples: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:22, 22 September 2002 edit217.168.172.202 (talk)mNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 05:34, 19 October 2002 edit undo203.97.97.130 (talk)mNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
The Germanic peoples are frequently blamed in popular conceptions for the "Fall" of the ] in the late ]. Professional ] and ] have since the ] shifted their interpretations in such a way that the Germanic peoples are no longer seen as '''invading''' a decaying empire but as being '''co-opted''' into helping defend territory the central government could no longer adequately administer. The Germanic peoples are frequently blamed in popular conceptions for the "Fall" of the ] in the late ]. Professional ] and ] have since the ] shifted their interpretations in such a way that the Germanic peoples are no longer seen as '''invading''' a decaying empire but as being '''co-opted''' into helping defend territory the central government could no longer adequately administer.


The presence of successor states controlled by an ethnically Germanic nobility is clear in the ]. How they got there is the substance of the debate today. Perhaps more important in the ] of the ] and the ] of the ] has been the debate about exactly what "tribe" or "people" meant to these groups, whose fluidity and willingness to blend is clear from the written record. The late classical sources are especially clear for the blended nature of the ]. The presence of successor states controlled by an ethnically Germanic nobility is clear in the ]. How they got there is the substance of the debate today. Perhaps more important in the ] of the ] and the ] of the ] has been the debate about exactly what "tribe" or "people" meant to these groups, whose fluidity and willingness to blend is clear from the written record. The late classical sources are especially clear in the matter of the blended nature of the ].


Individuals and small groups from Germanic tribes had long been recruited from the ''limes'' or border regions of the Roman world and had risen high in the command stucture of the army -- ], who deposed ] is an example. In the later empire the government began to recruit whole tribal groups under their native leaders as officers. Individuals and small groups from Germanic tribes had long been recruited from the ''limes'' or border regions of the Roman world and had risen high in the command stucture of the army -- ], who deposed ] is an example. In the later empire the government began to recruit whole tribal groups under their native leaders as officers.


The ], ], and ] were converted to ] while they were still outside the bounds of the Empire; however, they were converted to the ] heresy rather than to orthodox ]. The one great written remnant of the ] was a translation of portions of the ] made by ], the missionary who converted them. The ] were not converted until after their entrance into the Empire, but received Christianity from Arian Germanic groups. The ], ], and ] were converted to ] while they were still outside the bounds of the Empire; however, they were converted to the ] heresy rather than to orthodox ]. The one great written remnant of the ] is a translation of portions of the ] made by ], the missionary who converted them. The ] were not converted until after their entrance into the Empire, but received Christianity from Arian Germanic groups.


The ] were converted directly from ] to ] without an intervening time as Arians. The ] were converted directly from ] to ] without an intervening time as Arians.

Revision as of 05:34, 19 October 2002

The Germanic Peoples

The idea of a single German people, or Volk, is a relatively recent development, largely invented by 19th- and 20th-century writers and politicians. From ancient times, several ethnic groups have mixed to shape the history of Germany. Even though the Romans had often grouped several peoples under the name Germans, it is doubtful that most of these groups viewed themselves as connected in any cultural, linguistic, or political sense. The formation of an eastern Frankish kingdom in the 9th century seems a watershed event in German development, although this kingdom featured a diversity of cultures and political allegiances. Most of the medieval "German" rulers actually considered themselves kings of the Romans, and, later, Roman emperors. Not until the 15th century did the emperors officially add "of the German nation" to their title. (Source: Microsoft Corporation, Encarta.)

The Germanic peoples are frequently blamed in popular conceptions for the "Fall" of the Roman Empire in the late 5th century. Professional historians and archaeologists have since the 1950s shifted their interpretations in such a way that the Germanic peoples are no longer seen as invading a decaying empire but as being co-opted into helping defend territory the central government could no longer adequately administer.

The presence of successor states controlled by an ethnically Germanic nobility is clear in the 6th century. How they got there is the substance of the debate today. Perhaps more important in the last decade of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st has been the debate about exactly what "tribe" or "people" meant to these groups, whose fluidity and willingness to blend is clear from the written record. The late classical sources are especially clear in the matter of the blended nature of the Alamanni.

Individuals and small groups from Germanic tribes had long been recruited from the limes or border regions of the Roman world and had risen high in the command stucture of the army -- Odoacer, who deposed Romulus Augustulus is an example. In the later empire the government began to recruit whole tribal groups under their native leaders as officers.

The Ostrogoths, Visigoths, and Vandals were converted to Christianity while they were still outside the bounds of the Empire; however, they were converted to the Arian heresy rather than to orthodox Catholicism. The one great written remnant of the Gothic language is a translation of portions of the Bible made by Ulfilas, the missionary who converted them. The Lombards were not converted until after their entrance into the Empire, but received Christianity from Arian Germanic groups.

The Franks were converted directly from paganism to Catholicism without an intervening time as Arians.

Batavii -- Bavarii -- Burgundians -- Frisians -- Saxons