| Revision as of 19:33, 8 July 2010 editClaritas (talk | contribs)7,095 edits Creating deletion discussion page for 4 Girls 4 Harps. (TW) | Revision as of 19:41, 8 July 2010 edit undoTreasuryTag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,645 edits wkNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :({{Find sources|4 Girls 4 Harps}}) | :({{Find sources|4 Girls 4 Harps}}) | ||
| Musical ensemble which appears not to meet ] or ]. They've received significant coverage in some local papers, but The Times coverage seems to be pretty trivial. ] ] 19:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC) | Musical ensemble which appears not to meet ] or ]. They've received significant coverage in some local papers, but The Times coverage seems to be pretty trivial. ] ] 19:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Weak keep'''—I've added a couple more references indicating that they have significant coverage in ''diverse'' local papers. This isn't merely a regional phenomenon but a nationwide one; it just so happens that local papers do the reporting. But local papers in Birmingham and the Cotswolds etc. <font color="#00ACF4">╟─]]►]─╢</font> 19:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:41, 8 July 2010
4 Girls 4 Harps
- 4 Girls 4 Harps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Musical ensemble which appears not to meet WP:BAND or WP:GNG. They've received significant coverage in some local papers, but The Times coverage seems to be pretty trivial. Claritas § 19:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Weak keep—I've added a couple more references indicating that they have significant coverage in diverse local papers. This isn't merely a regional phenomenon but a nationwide one; it just so happens that local papers do the reporting. But local papers in Birmingham and the Cotswolds etc. ╟─TreasuryTag►co-prince─╢ 19:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)