Misplaced Pages

Talk:Popular Front of India: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:10, 23 April 2010 editFazlu2010 (talk | contribs)91 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 14:25, 9 July 2010 edit undoArglebargleIV (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers36,102 edits Rewrite needed: new sectionNext edit →
Line 37: Line 37:


] (]) 20:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC) ] (]) 20:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

== Rewrite needed ==

The prose and the balance of this article are both lacking. I'm going to be rewriting several sections across the next few days. -- ] (]) 14:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:25, 9 July 2010

WikiProject iconIndia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on February 20, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

== Popupar front is not a political party. It has a political strategy for supporting the down-trodden in the society, but not a political organisation. It is just a confederation of different like minded organisations. Popularindia 12:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

I dont know what is a neutrality issue here. Need to remove the tag.Popularindia 07:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Many events are listed here. I feel that a brief detail of each event can be given, either in the same page or a separate page. If not proper references can be put for each events.

popular front do not have any link with terrorist organizations in india or abroad ,here given reference was fake and non-existent so as an encyclopedia that fake information should not come in this page,so i removed the fake link --Fazlu2010 (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Initial level of formatting and wikifying is done

The page has originally contained un-wikified article. Now I have edited page and cleaned all the WOI and POV. Please remove the tag for deletion Sundaram7 11:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Tag AfD is no more valid

The arguments that are raised by user:mareda at ] is no more exisits.Ashokachakra 05:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pfi.jpg

Image:Pfi.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Rewrite needed

The prose and the balance of this article are both lacking. I'm going to be rewriting several sections across the next few days. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 14:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Categories: