Talk:Etisalat: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →

Revision as of 02:56, 26 March 2010 editWildBot (talk \| contribs)Bots142,891 editsm No ambiguous links left← Previous edit	Revision as of 17:35, 4 August 2010 edit undoMMuzammils (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users7,322 editsm moved Talk:Etisalat to Talk:Emirates Telecommunications Corporation: Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, is the legal name.Next edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 17:35, 4 August 2010

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Etisalat article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Companies B‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

B This article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Misplaced Pages:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Telecommunications Unassessed

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Egypt B‑class

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United Arab Emirates: Abu Dhabi / Dubai B‑class Mid‑importance

	United Arab Emirates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Arab Emirates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Arab Emirates on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United Arab EmiratesWikipedia:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesTemplate:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesUnited Arab Emirates
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Abu Dhabi (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Dubai (assessed as Mid-importance).

Vandalism

This article has been completely replaced with a new one, as I'm noticing on Saturday, April 21, 2007. Looks like someone at Etisalat has completely replaced the entry with a press release from themselves? Antivert 01:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, it appears much of the article was removed due to violation of certain policies, and much of this Etisalat-aggrandizing information was added later. Time to clean up the article I guess, and provide new links with sources for the censorship-related stuff. Antivert 01:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Sigh! Corporate vandalism is so fun. Antivert 01:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I have to edit here one more time just to show how crass this is:

http://hrw.org/advocacy/internet/mena/uae.htm (Human Rights Watch on Etisalat and Free Expression)

was changed to:

http://www.weyak.ae (Etisalat’s entertainment portal)

There were numerous problems with NOR in the Censorship section before. Much of it is verifiably true if you live in the UAE, but lacked credible sources. I'm not restoring the section because it should be rewritten. Antivert 02:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

There also used to be a link to the website of the service they use to determine what sites they block. Its an American company that sells a list of categorized sites. Does anyone have that link or remember the name ?

Unfortunately, the whole page does still seem to read more like an advertisement for Etisalat than an objective article. Huw Thomas ITSI Middle East - 28 Aug 08 202.174.156.68 (talk) 06:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Who is this self-proclaiming idiot? No sources, no citations, nothing, just someone claiming to have "hacked" Etisalat's network. Just out of the blue!

"On June 4, 2004, the Etisalat network got hacked by an 18 years old Iranian student, Amir Mohammad Siahpolo, who was studying IT at the University of Wollongong in Dubai. He penetrated Etisalat's main server. Although no data was removed or changed, he was arrested by police 2 days later. At the time of his arrest, he said "I just wanted to reach the questions of my exam that were available on the website of my university." He volunteered to treat the network problem, and the offer was accepted."

I had to remove it, it's just a ridiculous self-proclaiming remark. --V3rbum (talk) 09:31, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

EIM

(GMT+4)

Removed this: Upon the new release of the latest ISP for the United Arab Emirates will allow the complete unblocking of every internet site on the planet.

There's been no announcement as to whether DU, the 'new' ISP, will operate a proxy-free system. Conversely, it's been reported that those areas that currently don't operate through the Etisalat proxy (freezones, EMAAR residential areas, etc) will, in fact, have it imposed before the year-end.

Verification needed

There might be a third ISP but will be partially owned by etisalat.The facts are unknown if they will restrict the internet or not OR the ISP will come in service. If it does, The ISP will be up and running By December 2006.

Interesting and important article. I wonder what is meant by the "weasle word" reference in the end of the article. It seems like that would be an easy one to edit and get that cleaned up. VX 20:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Controversial Company

Removed many sections of the entry due to failure to comply with Misplaced Pages rules. If you're unsure of the rules, please visit: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines . We all know that Etisalat is doing some pretty devious things, but let's please adhere to Misplaced Pages's policies. Antivert

There are also several problems with NPOV in this article. Please be encylopaedic.

Cable TV?

"citation needed" added for the statement that Etisalat holds a monopoly in the cable TV field. This needs to be clarified, as there are multiple cable TV operators in the UAE, including Dubai.

Old Information

The article contains very old information and it is not up to date. Please help updating the article

Reliable? Yeah Right!

Look, i've been to UAE, and reliable does not come to mind to most customers of Etisalat. This is the first time i have heard anybody saying this about Etisalat. Nabeel_co 04:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked sites

Why was the section on blocked sites removed?--SohanDsouza 20:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

It was removed without comment, and so was the see also section, mentioning their non-blocking competition, du (telco). I am about to restore the content removed without explanation. Thanks for the catch, SohanDsouza. —Fudoreaper 21:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

This section needs to attribute the new role of TRA that is actually managing the proxy right now. TRA is also mandating a proxy for du, although they face stiff resistance and obstacles from du officials. They've claimed so far all sorts of technical obstacles :-) --V3rbum (talk) 07:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Etisalatblock.gif

Image:Etisalatblock.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Resource

is a good resource for documenting censorship by Etisalat. Superm401 - Talk 21:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Criticism?

With regard to these points:

With a 1Mbit connection the download speed can be as high as 120Kbytes and the upload speed will be around 13Kbytes, If you pay for a 2Mbits connection, the speed can be as high as approx. 250KBytes/s and upload speed as high as 35kB/s. 4Mbits connection gives you double the download transfer rate at approx. 430KBytes/s, but the upload speed will not go higher than 55kB/s.
Connection to most servers around the world won't give you the 430kB/s (4Mb) download speed.

This sounds fairly comparable for ADSL connections around the world. Don't think this is specificly only to do with Etisalat. I nominate for removal - 129.11.208.16 (talk) 13:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Prayer in this article?

"This tradition is not from the time of the Prophet -peace be upon him- or his Sahabah."

is that appropriate for a wikipedia article? 169.252.4.21 (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Categories: