| Revision as of 22:39, 19 August 2010 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,017 edits Added {{tilde}} note.← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:23, 20 August 2010 edit undoBinksternet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers495,207 edits strike through and explanationNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == August 2010 == | == August 2010 == | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If the edit warring continues, '''you may be ] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 22:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC) | <s>] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If the edit warring continues, '''you may be ] from editing''' without further notice.</s> <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 22:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make any ] edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.'' | |||
| :My mistake! I should not have reverted your ] edits as vandalism, since you did not specifically violate the ]. I should instead have reverted them in the normal way while explaining the reversion on the talk page. Cheers - ] (]) 00:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | ==Your recent edits== | ||
Revision as of 00:23, 20 August 2010
August 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wife acceptance factor. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
- My mistake! I should not have reverted your Wife acceptance factor edits as vandalism, since you did not specifically violate the ]. I should instead have reverted them in the normal way while explaining the reversion on the talk page. Cheers - Binksternet (talk) 00:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC)