| Revision as of 12:59, 14 August 2010 editPhoenix7777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,541 edits →Requested move: fix← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:33, 22 August 2010 edit undoCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →Requested move: funny it isNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| ] → {{noredirect|1=Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty}} — The name "Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty" is used more often ( vs ) and, IMHO, it is also much more understandable for non-Korean people. ] (]) 07:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC) | ] → {{noredirect|1=Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty}} — The name "Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty" is used more often ( vs ) and, IMHO, it is also much more understandable for non-Korean people. ] (]) 07:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''support''' per above. ―― ] (]) 12:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | *'''support''' per above. ―― ] (]) 12:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Oppose'''- because the Google result is simply missing many things and Elmor inaccurately presents the actual statistics. As you look into the result closely, "Eulsa Treaty" or "Ulsa Treaty" is more prevalently used than the suggested name in the suggested links and references. Also, the suggested name is used as explain the meaning of Eulsa Treaty just like ] or ] (don't expect people in the English people all know Shimonoseki means what). People outside the world who must study and learn the pertinent subject (such as Americans, Japanese and Chiese of course) don't know what Taft-Katsura or Shimonoseki mean, but learn the meaning by reading the explanation following the title as well as the other example. To accurately test with the Google, just simply add "" to the name that Elmor favors, and then you will see the magical number is all gone but its appears with much belower numbers (more than 1/2) than the current trick.--] 07:33, 22 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:33, 22 August 2010
 | Korea Start‑class | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | Japan Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Requested move
 | It has been proposed in this section that Japan–Korea Treaty of 1905 be renamed and moved to Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move |
Eulsa Treaty → Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty — The name "Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty" is used more often ( vs ) and, IMHO, it is also much more understandable for non-Korean people. Elmor (talk) 07:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- support per above. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 12:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose- because the Google result is simply missing many things and Elmor inaccurately presents the actual statistics. As you look into the result closely, "Eulsa Treaty" or "Ulsa Treaty" is more prevalently used than the suggested name in the suggested links and references. Also, the suggested name is used as explain the meaning of Eulsa Treaty just like Taft–Katsura Agreement or Treaty of Shimonoseki (don't expect people in the English people all know Shimonoseki means what). People outside the world who must study and learn the pertinent subject (such as Americans, Japanese and Chiese of course) don't know what Taft-Katsura or Shimonoseki mean, but learn the meaning by reading the explanation following the title as well as the other example. To accurately test with the Google, just simply add "" to the name that Elmor favors, and then you will see the magical number is all gone but its appears with much belower numbers (more than 1/2) than the current trick.--Caspian blue 07:33, 22 August 2010 (UTC)