| Revision as of 20:21, 27 August 2010 editRaj the one (talk | contribs)97 edits →Yadav Vs Ahir modifications← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:23, 27 August 2010 edit undoRaj the one (talk | contribs)97 edits →Yadav Vs Ahir modificationsNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| : IPAddress fella, Go and read ancient vedas and Purans like Vayu purana, Padam Puran, Bhavishya purana, before commenting anything worth credibility on Yadav Vs Ahir. The books published in post independence(2001,2005, an ugly vulgar joke in the name of historical research and analysis) and nothing but crap political propaganda and must never be a reference for anything. Cambridge publication in UK, can not be a certificate for authenticity. | : IPAddress fella, Go and read ancient vedas and Purans like Vayu purana, Padam Puran, Bhavishya purana, before commenting anything worth credibility on Yadav Vs Ahir. The books published in post independence(2001,2005, an ugly vulgar joke in the name of historical research and analysis) and nothing but crap political propaganda and must never be a reference for anything. Cambridge publication in UK, can not be a certificate for authenticity. | ||
| : The mouth-peice of Indian social/political claims are vedas and puranas. No vedas and puranas mentions about any |
: The mouth-peice of Indian social/political claims are vedas and puranas. No vedas and puranas mentions about any _crap_hidden_bongo_babu books like Manu-Smriti. | ||
| : In India everybody read/listen/knows Vedas and Puranas, stories from ages. What comes out of ] was nothing more the a firm stand on what we always believed about ourself. All the puranas like Padam, Vayu, Bhavisya, Mahabharat are apt proof of same. | : In India everybody read/listen/knows Vedas and Puranas, stories from ages. What comes out of ] was nothing more the a firm stand on what we always believed about ourself. All the puranas like Padam, Vayu, Bhavisya, Mahabharat are apt proof of same. | ||
Revision as of 20:23, 27 August 2010
January 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wolverine (comics), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wolverine (comics) was changed by 142.205.241.254 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-01-30T19:41:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Animal glue. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cadwaladr (talk) 23:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
April 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit that you made to the page 2010 Stanley Cup playoffs has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Calmer Waters 17:04, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Your test on the page Leonardo Bonucci worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 19:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Ranjit Singh
The section on Ranjit Singh and Gypsies has already been added further down, hence it's deletion. Scroll down the page. Thanks--Sikh-History 19:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- The ancestry of this Maharaja is a very widely discussed subject and has adequate notability as a controversy to merit inclusion in the lead of this article (see WP:Lead)--142.205.241.254 (talk) 19:45, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Aheer vs Ahir
I think you are confusing these two groups: Aheer and Ahir. Please look at the Misplaced Pages articles and you will see why the group Aheer was re-added by me yesterday. I have added it back in again today as they are two different groups. Regards, --Diannaa 19:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Yadav Vs Ahir modifications
The facts mentioned in the Ahir taken a false identitiy of Yadav is incorrect. And these false informations are propogated in recently publised books, which no authority in subject. The book contents are based on news paper articles and courts records, whose validities are as genuine as a lawyer's statement.
Let me know, which part is objectionable in the below content of Yadav, which u feel to modify. In case of failing to justify your argument, ur IP address will be notified for Vandalizm.
- The British census in 1881, half century before any Sanskritization movement, the census mentions Yadavas as Ahirs & Goalis. It says "The Yadavas, who in their turn are identified with the Gaolis and Ahirs, were the dominant race at that time. Hemadpant, the temple builder, was the minister of Ramchandra, the Yadava ruler of Deogiri, in the 13th century."
- However, most books publiced as recently as 2001, 2005, propogates the dubious theories generated based on old new paper articles and court records, that present day Yadav caste is merely renamed Ahirs who switched their identity in 1922 to Yadav as part of Sanskritization movement of certain Hindu castes.
- IPAddress fella, Go and read ancient vedas and Purans like Vayu purana, Padam Puran, Bhavishya purana, before commenting anything worth credibility on Yadav Vs Ahir. The books published in post independence(2001,2005, an ugly vulgar joke in the name of historical research and analysis) and nothing but crap political propaganda and must never be a reference for anything. Cambridge publication in UK, can not be a certificate for authenticity.
- The mouth-peice of Indian social/political claims are vedas and puranas. No vedas and puranas mentions about any _crap_hidden_bongo_babu books like Manu-Smriti.
- In India everybody read/listen/knows Vedas and Puranas, stories from ages. What comes out of sanskritization was nothing more the a firm stand on what we always believed about ourself. All the puranas like Padam, Vayu, Bhavisya, Mahabharat are apt proof of same.
- Padma Purana, where Vishnu informed Abhiras, "I shall be born among you, O Abhiras, at Mathura in my eighth birth".
- Individuals starts going so low in discussion that idiotic claims like Ahir are not Abhira. Raj the one (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
AfC Creation
AfC Reviewing
Hello, as everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, we ask that only logged in users review Articles For Creation. Thank you, Joe Gazz84 (user)•(talk)•(contribs) 22:53, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- http://www.chaf.lib.latrobe.edu.au/dcd/page.php?title=&record=389
- The politics of the urban poor in early twentieth-century India, Page 205, Nandini Gooptu, Cambridge University , Press, 2001
- Land tenure and peasant in South Asia, Page 198, Robert Eric Frykenberg, Manohar, 1984
- Caste and race in India, Page 450, G.S. Ghurye, Popular Prakashan, 2005
- Caste and the Indian Army, Economic Weekly, 1439-1443 August 29 1964
- The tribes and castes of West Bengal , page 35, Asok Mitra, Alipore, West Bengal : West Bengal Government Press, 1953