Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Maths, science, and technology: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:35, 4 February 2006 edit69.165.135.68 (talk) →Telecommunications and digital technology ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:24, 4 February 2006 edit undo213.130.141.147 (talk) →Clinical and medical topics Next edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	===Clinical and medical topics===		===Clinical and medical topics===
			*] - edit war between and . Thoughts? 16:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
	*] - The ] a division of the National Institute of Health (NIH) is alledged to be "controversial" with references to skeptic organization journals or websites in support. This vague or meaningless criticism of a respectable organization is not even expressed as the opinion of these skeptic organizations. 14:58, 1 February 2006 (UTC)		*] - The ] a division of the National Institute of Health (NIH) is alledged to be "controversial" with references to skeptic organization journals or websites in support. This vague or meaningless criticism of a respectable organization is not even expressed as the opinion of these skeptic organizations. 14:58, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:24, 4 February 2006

Talk:Cock (chicken) Disagreement over whether page should be renamed to Rooster. Comments from speakers of a wide range of Englishes sought. 20:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:AIDS reappraisal User SGactorNY has been trying to remove any scientific criticism of the so-called AIDS dissident movement which claims HIV does not cause AIDS. He has repeatedly done this by bullying and insulting other editors and keeps telling people to stop editing "his" page. Nrets 04:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Diabetes mellitus Anon editor has placed a couple comments linking juvenile diabetes and milk, which seems suspicious to me, but I'm no expert. Medical folks? 03:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Irreducible_complexity The term was credited to Ludwig von Bertalanffy, a claim was eventually removed because a citation was not provided for the challenged material, despite the fact that the request was made nearly a month ago. Should the material be removed or is a citation not required? 23:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Shiloh Shepherd Dog - how breed registries should be included in the article 18:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Anecdotal evidence - edit war between this version and this version. Thoughts? 16:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Transcendental Meditation - The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine a division of the National Institute of Health (NIH) is alledged to be "controversial" with references to skeptic organization journals or websites in support. This vague or meaningless criticism of a respectable organization is not even expressed as the opinion of these skeptic organizations. 14:58, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Fred R. Klenner - should the biography mention that his son was Fritz Klenner, implicated in multiple murder? 14:09, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Smegma#Picture: Discussion on whether an image of visible smegma on a human male penis should be displayed inline or linked.
Talk:Thimerosal - Request for comments with regard to a variety of vaccine and autism related pages as to the appropriate content of the See also section. Multiple pages are involved - the disagreement centers on inclusion of a large number of links from one POV which often have little apparent bearing on the article at hand. 04:41, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chi Machine - A device that "oxygenates" the body and supposedly heals a lot of things. Originally presented as fact. Claims and references were added, but the original editor keeps reverting them. 13:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Mathematics RFC's should also be cross-posted and announced at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Mathematics

Physics RFC's should also be cross-posted and announced at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Physics

Talk:phpBB — should external links to unofficial phpBB sites be allowed, specifically phpbbhacks.com? 21:20, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Virtual Network Computing Should we include a long list of external links to software that uses the VNC protocol. 15:31, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:North American Numbering Plan#US-centric_area_code_page_titles — Uncle G's major work 'bot is about to move another ... er ... small hill. But a consensus is required on the naming scheme to be employed. Please review Category:Greek Area Codes, Category:United Kingdom area codes, Category:North American area codes, and Misplaced Pages:Deletion policy/Area codes; and then contribute to the discussion. 16:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Classic_NES_Series — Disagreement over two pieces of criticism. I left a note on ERW1980's talk page, to which he responded on my page, but since then nothing else has transpired. Hbdragon88 22:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Podcasting — should we have a link to http://www.how-to-podcast-tutorial.com/what-is-a-podcast.htm 05:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Neopets — Should there be a link to http://www.antineopian.org?

Does this video work:
Power-assisted bicycle.
:What could be done to improve this video for the article motorized bicycle. 19:48, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Motorized bicycle#RFC: Triumph Image: The question of removal of this picture from the article? (debate on if we should be including this picture or not in the article motorized bicycle.) (this one was mis-classed by me on 6 January 2006 (UTC)) 22:56, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Interstate_76_(east)#Back_to_the_routeboxint has an edit war about the infobox. The issue was taken to Misplaced Pages:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/29_12_2005_Interstate_76_(east) as well. Please respond on Talk:Interstate_76_(east)#. Thanks, SteveMc 03:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- This edit war has since spread to Interstate 4 and Interstate 26. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Request for comment/motorized bicycle, POV-pushing, lack of citation WP:CITE, revert warring in between user:CyclePat and user:JzG. Some WP:NPA violations also.--CyclePat 17:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Transcendental Meditation The issue is how to apply the Misplaced Pages:Verifiability policy in the case of pro or non-pro scientific studies or scientific affirmations about the transcendental meditation technique, including assertions on the scientific methods used. See also Rfc in Religion and philosophy 19:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)