| Revision as of 09:51, 29 August 2010 editMabuska (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,831 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Germanic Europe. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:52, 29 August 2010 edit undoMabuska (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,831 edits →August 2010Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| == August 2010 == | == August 2010 == | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If the edit warring continues, '''you may be ] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''Please stop adding unsourced biased and PoV claims into articles. If you want to add in controversial and biased information open a discussion on it and provide |
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If the edit warring continues, '''you may be ] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''Please stop adding unsourced biased and PoV claims into articles. If you want to add in controversial and biased information open a discussion on it and provide any reliable and verifiable sources you have to back up their inclusion - otherwise desist. ] <sup>]</sup> 09:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC)'' ] | ||
Revision as of 09:52, 29 August 2010
Tallaght Stadium
Shamrock Rovers' official website says capacity's 6500. --Exorcist Z (talk) 21:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Shamrock Rovers 0-2 Juve's attendance was 5900... so stadium's capacity can't be 5700. Official website says 6000 and I think we should write the official thing. PS: good game. --Exorcist Z (talk) 22:08, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
WT:BISE
Your template {{Briland}} along with the situation at White people and articles relating to Wolves in the British Isles are being discuss by the British Isles Terminology task force at WT:BISE, in the last 3 sections of the BISE talk page. Your contribution to the debate there would be helpful thanks. BritishWatcher (talk) 12:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Unsourced and potentially pov edits
I reverted your edits on North-West Europe as they and unsourced and hint of PoV. If Protestantism isn't a trait of Celtic Europe? Tell that to the majority of Welsh and Scots who adhere to Protestant faiths as well as to the Irish Protestants. Find a verifiable and reliable source to back up such an absurd and redicuolous claim and then you have a case for such an edit. Mabuska 09:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
August 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Germanic Europe. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding unsourced biased and PoV claims into articles. If you want to add in controversial and biased information open a discussion on it and provide any reliable and verifiable sources you have to back up their inclusion - otherwise desist. Mabuska 09:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC) Mabuska