| Revision as of 21:31, 1 June 2004 editLucky 6.9 (talk | contribs)26,567 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:32, 1 June 2004 edit undoDuncharris (talk | contribs)30,510 edits delete patent nonsense, POV christian fundamentalist bullshit.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| :''This page has been listed on ]. Please see ] for justifications and discussion]''<br> | :''This page has been listed on ]. Please see ] for justifications and discussion]''<br> | ||
| or... | |||
| {{msg:delete}} | |||
| This argument holds that the design of living beings is poor, and thus no higher intelligence could account for such a design. Let's look at humans. | This argument holds that the design of living beings is poor, and thus no higher intelligence could account for such a design. Let's look at humans. | ||
Revision as of 21:32, 1 June 2004
- This page has been listed on Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion. Please see its entry on that page for justifications and discussion.
or...
This redirect may meet Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion, but no reason has been given for why it qualifies. Please ensure that your reason is based on one of the speedy deletion criteria. Replace this tag with {{db|1=some reason}}. NA
If this redirect does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message. Note that this redirect may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient.
Note to administrators: this redirect has content on its talk page which should be checked before deletion. Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.This page was last edited by Duncharris (contribs | logs) at 21:32, 1 June 2004 (UTC) (20 years ago) |
This argument holds that the design of living beings is poor, and thus no higher intelligence could account for such a design. Let's look at humans.
Humans are very fragile creatures. They must live in an environment with a very narrow temperature range (considering the extreme highs and lows in the natural world). They succumb to disease and degenerative processes too easily.
But the most obvious part of the argument has to do with how new humans are created.
When a sperm cell and an egg meet, they blend their DNA to create new DNA for a new being. If this were the end of the story, it would be a sign of genius, and an argument that a god or gods Italic texthadItalic text to exist. But, the story goes on.
After the new fetus starts developing, it generates massive amounts of Testosterone or Estrogen. These hormones lead to the development of the proper sex organs. This is where the design flaw is: this level of indirection is, in the minds of atheists, a sign of total incompetence. Thus, if a god or gods exist, he/she/they are unworshippable.