| Revision as of 04:08, 1 February 2006 edit69.133.205.8 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:16, 8 February 2006 edit undoAndros 1337 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers18,541 edits remove spamNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| There is no need for a quotes section in this article. The one quote provided is neither notable nor truly NPOV. What is the point of the quote? To show he swears? To show he cares about money for Virginia? I just don't get it. Wikiquotes is to be used for random direct quotations. Might I suggest you add this there. --] <sup><font color="#3D9140">]</font></sup> 16:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC) | There is no need for a quotes section in this article. The one quote provided is neither notable nor truly NPOV. What is the point of the quote? To show he swears? To show he cares about money for Virginia? I just don't get it. Wikiquotes is to be used for random direct quotations. Might I suggest you add this there. --] <sup><font color="#3D9140">]</font></sup> 16:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==SICK OF THIS GUY== | |||
| "He hates Al Franken, and promises if he ever became President that he would push for Franken's impeachment from public radio service because he sucks." I'M TIRED OF THE FRANKENVANDAL SLANDERING THE GOOD NAME OF AL FRANKENSTEIN. | |||
Revision as of 18:16, 8 February 2006
I can't believe there is no talk page for this article. For someone that people think will be the next Republican presidential candidate, there's not much here. I'll go out on a limb and make a prediction here (yes I know WP is not a crystal ball): Allen-Rice would be a winning ticket for the right, even if HRC does run. Just thought I'd go on record so when it happens, I can have bragging rights. --LV 21:51, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
No military, no presidency
With the war on terror, Americans will want a strong leader with a military background. When it comes time to pull the lever, Hillary, her lack of international and military experience will make her too weak for voters. George Allen is in the same boat. Gilluiani's pro-choice stance is too liberal for the GOP and the nation is not ready (I am) for a female, black president, with no prior service record (maybe in peace time). That leaves a possible McCain / Kerry show down in 2008 with McCain winning easily.
- McCain has done almost everything possible to piss-off the Republican base. He can't get nominated unless he goes ahead and joins the Democrats. All George Allen needs to do is to satisfy the Republican base with his words and actions, and he's a shoo-in to be the next president.
--Bedford 13:15, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- You are correct, McCain will never get the Republican nomination. And I think the United States is ready for a female President, even a Black one. The righties already love her, and she would almost for sure pull votes from the Dems solid base of African-Americans and women. And I doubt Kerry will get the Democratic nomination after the beating he (more specifically, his campaign) took last time. Okay... no more of this talk, back to writing articles. --LV 15:14, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Folks, this page isn't to discuss George Allen, it's to discuss the article about him. I agree with Lord Voldemort's comment: "no more of this talk". For general political conversations, please check out Democratic Underground or Free Republic (those actual websites, not our articles about them). JamesMLane 16:04, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
this guy is becoming important
So the fact that he's divorced should be mentioned
--grazon 01:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- I added it, but I haven't found the name of his first wife, the date of the marriage, the date of the divorce, or whether there were any children. All I can find is that USA Today says the divorce occurred "in the early 1980s". We should try to get the full information. JamesMLane 03:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
this should help
http://www.nndb.com/people/185/000032089/
--grazon 03:44, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Quotations
There is no need for a quotes section in this article. The one quote provided is neither notable nor truly NPOV. What is the point of the quote? To show he swears? To show he cares about money for Virginia? I just don't get it. Wikiquotes is to be used for random direct quotations. Might I suggest you add this there. --LV 16:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)