| Revision as of 02:04, 28 October 2010 edit4meter4 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users110,702 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:56, 29 October 2010 edit undoTnxman307 (talk | contribs)64,361 edits →Unblocked: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] (]) 02:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] (]) 02:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Unblocked == | |||
| I spoke with ] regarding ]. After our discussion, it is clear that the accounts mentioned in the case are operated by different people. These accounts will be unblocked. However, please proceed with care in the future. Risker suggested that you and your friends edit in different areas. This is excellent advice, which I strongly suggest you all heed. There is much relevant advice on ] about how to proceed when you share an IP address with another user. Please review that page and follow the instructions listed there - this will help avoid future problems. If you have questions about Misplaced Pages or editing here, please contact me on my talk page. <font color="darkorange">]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>]</big></font></b><font color="red">]</font> 14:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:56, 29 October 2010
Leave me a note !
Iowa explosion
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I appreciate your contributions to the USS Iowa turret explosion article. Usually, a name is wikilinked only the first time it appears in the article. Anyway, what do you think of the article? Do you think it focuses too much on certain aspects of the subject and not enough on others? Cla68 (talk) 22:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Ooops; beginners mistake. I think it is balanced give the sources available. I read over the comments page, and do not see much specificity in the criticism.--Coldplay3332 (talk) 14:20, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the articles. I'll go through them and add additional information as appropriate. Feel free to do so yourself also. If you think information is important, but not important enough to go in the article text, it can be included in the footnote. Since the article texts are copyrighted, I'm going to need to delete them eventually, but thanks again. Cla68 (talk) 22:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
ANI
You are being discussed at ANI as a possible sockpuppet/meatpuppet of Cmagha. Thanks. Racepacket (talk) 11:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Cmagha for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 4meter4 (talk) 02:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Unblocked
I spoke with Risker regarding your sockpuppet investigation. After our discussion, it is clear that the accounts mentioned in the case are operated by different people. These accounts will be unblocked. However, please proceed with care in the future. Risker suggested that you and your friends edit in different areas. This is excellent advice, which I strongly suggest you all heed. There is much relevant advice on this page about how to proceed when you share an IP address with another user. Please review that page and follow the instructions listed there - this will help avoid future problems. If you have questions about Misplaced Pages or editing here, please contact me on my talk page. TNXMan 14:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)